Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Provide proper console auto-completion with cdt-gdb-vscode #75

Open
planger opened this issue Oct 18, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Provide proper console auto-completion with cdt-gdb-vscode #75

planger opened this issue Oct 18, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@planger
Copy link

planger commented Oct 18, 2022

Feature Description:

Currently the auto-completion in the console of a cdt-gdb-vscode debug console is just listing found words:
image

For other language this auto-completion supports variables of the actual scope.

Probably this is a cdt-gdb-vscode? @jonahgraham

@planger planger added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 18, 2022
@jonahgraham
Copy link
Contributor

Yes - I will transfer issue there. I think that Ericsson did some work on this, at least in Linux, so that it works well with GDB CLI which has good completion support.

@jonahgraham jonahgraham transferred this issue from eclipse-cdt-cloud/cdt-cloud-blueprint Oct 18, 2022
@paul-marechal
Copy link
Member

I think that Ericsson did some work on this, at least in Linux, so that it works well with GDB CLI which has good completion support.

The exact scope of that work is to enable opening an extra terminal within clients that's hooked to GDB's command line interface for humans while at the same time interfacing with the same GDB instance over MI in the background when handling DAP messages.

Unfortunately this work doesn't apply to the Debug Console opened by clients while debugging :/

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants