Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider ditching SpecFlow and using regular nunit style tests #225

Open
nbarnwell opened this issue May 3, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Consider ditching SpecFlow and using regular nunit style tests #225

nbarnwell opened this issue May 3, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@nbarnwell
Copy link

I'm just working on adding support for a command to set the default path for ADR files, and most of my time has been spent wrangling SpecFlow. I could have written a single nunit test and just got on with things, but TDD is a real pain with so much boilerplate.

It's your game, so it's your rules, but I gotta tell ya, I wouldn't be upset if I could submit a PR to simplify it by removing SpecFlow entirely from the solution... :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant