Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

epresent should depend on org-8 in MELPA #33

Open
pscollins opened this issue Dec 2, 2015 · 3 comments
Open

epresent should depend on org-8 in MELPA #33

pscollins opened this issue Dec 2, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@pscollins
Copy link

I had problems trying to install epresent where I got the following error messages:

 Cannot open load file: ox

 Symbol's value as variable is void:    org-list-allow-alphabetical

Googling showed that it's because I was missing the latest version of org-mode. It seemed to be fixed by M-x package-install RET org RET but this should be taken care of the package's dependencies --- I see that org-present includes a dependency on org-7, for example.

If epresent does depend on org-8 as it appears to, then org-8 should be a dependency of the package.

dakrone added a commit to dakrone/epresent that referenced this issue Apr 8, 2016
@sellout
Copy link

sellout commented Jan 11, 2018

I don’t think this is an issue any more – Org 8.2 is included with current Emacs versions.

@ipstone
Copy link

ipstone commented Feb 8, 2018

I have org 8.2, but package install epresent shows that org-8 is not present.
But once switched to latest orgmode melpa setups as here, the issue is resovled:
https://orgmode.org/elpa.html

(require 'package)
(add-to-list 'package-archives '("org" . "https://orgmode.org/elpa/") t)

@adamjrat
Copy link

adamjrat commented Jun 27, 2019

Apparently it is still an issue! With a fresh install of emacs on updated centos7 and I hit this bug. Thanks to @pscollins for the workaround, and -1 to @sellout for the copout on dependency management.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants