You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the description for a triangle, a valid triangle is only valid if def isosceles(sides):
a + b ≥ c
b + c ≥ a
a + c ≥ b
But you can pass the test without an equal sign. So for example a valid triangle that might fail without the equals is [2,2,4] of the isosceles function, or [1,3,4] for the scalene function.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
At Exercism we use our Community Forum, not GitHub issues, as the primary place for discussion. That allows maintainers and contributors from across Exercism's ecosystem to discuss your problems/ideas/suggestions without them having to subscribe to hundreds of repositories.
This issue will be automatically closed. Please use this link to copy your GitHub Issue into a new topic on the forum, where we look forward to chatting with you!
If you're interested in learning more about this auto-responder, please read this blog post.
In the description for a triangle, a valid triangle is only valid if def isosceles(sides):
a + b ≥ c
b + c ≥ a
a + c ≥ b
But you can pass the test without an equal sign. So for example a valid triangle that might fail without the equals is [2,2,4] of the isosceles function, or [1,3,4] for the scalene function.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: