Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve Triangles testing #3703

Closed
TheKrol opened this issue May 21, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Improve Triangles testing #3703

TheKrol opened this issue May 21, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@TheKrol
Copy link

TheKrol commented May 21, 2024

In the description for a triangle, a valid triangle is only valid if def isosceles(sides):
a + b ≥ c
b + c ≥ a
a + c ≥ b
But you can pass the test without an equal sign. So for example a valid triangle that might fail without the equals is [2,2,4] of the isosceles function, or [1,3,4] for the scalene function.

Copy link
Contributor

Hello. Thanks for opening an issue on Exercism 🙂

At Exercism we use our Community Forum, not GitHub issues, as the primary place for discussion. That allows maintainers and contributors from across Exercism's ecosystem to discuss your problems/ideas/suggestions without them having to subscribe to hundreds of repositories.

This issue will be automatically closed. Please use this link to copy your GitHub Issue into a new topic on the forum, where we look forward to chatting with you!

If you're interested in learning more about this auto-responder, please read this blog post.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant