You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When searching for albums using the GUI, it’s common to encounter duplicate entries of the same album. The current “Quality” field provides basic information "LOSSLESS", but it would be highly beneficial if this field displayed more detailed specifications about the audio files. For instance, adding information about the bit depth (e.g., 24-bit, 16-bit) and sampling rate (e.g., 44kHz, 96kHz) would help users distinguish between identical entries and make more informed decisions about which version to download.
Suggestion / Feature Request
Detailed Quality Information
Expand the “Quality” field in the GUI to include:
Bit Depth (e.g., 16-bit, 24-bit).
Sampling Rate (e.g., 44kHz, 96kHz).
Example: Instead of just showing “LOSSLESS,” the field could display “M4A, 24-bit, 96kHz.” or "FLAC, 16-bit, 44kHz"
Improved Album Differentiation
Use the expanded “Quality” details to better differentiate between duplicate entries in album search results.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This would be great indeed. As far as I know the search API does not deliver these information, yet or maybe it is not implemented by tidalapi. If you have different information I would be glad to know them. Or even better: Just get me a pull request.
Current Situation
When searching for albums using the GUI, it’s common to encounter duplicate entries of the same album. The current “Quality” field provides basic information "LOSSLESS", but it would be highly beneficial if this field displayed more detailed specifications about the audio files. For instance, adding information about the bit depth (e.g., 24-bit, 16-bit) and sampling rate (e.g., 44kHz, 96kHz) would help users distinguish between identical entries and make more informed decisions about which version to download.
Suggestion / Feature Request
Detailed Quality Information
Improved Album Differentiation
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: