Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fdpo metataIssued etc. should likely be deprecated and we should just use dcterms:issued etc. #10

Open
JervenBolleman opened this issue Mar 12, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@JervenBolleman
Copy link

What type(s) of issue is this?

Ambiguity, Other (specify in text)

What is the issue?

<https://w3id.org/fdp/fdp-o#metadataIssued> a owl:DatatypeProperty ;
        rdfs:subPropertyOf <http://purl.org/dc/terms/date> ;
        rdfs:domain <https://w3id.org/fdp/fdp-o#Metadata> ;
        rdfs:range <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime> .

Should at least be more specific to be the subproperty of dcterms:issued. But it really raises the question should these properties exist at all?

@ericprud

@ericprud
Copy link

ericprud commented Aug 2, 2024

let's figure this out in Fukushima

@ifokkema
Copy link

They're currently regarded as being different concepts. See Luiz' response below to the issue I created about this:
#3

@JervenBolleman JervenBolleman changed the title fdpo metataIssued etc. should likely be depracted and we should just use dcterms:issued etc. fdpo metataIssued etc. should likely be deprecated and we should just use dcterms:issued etc. Sep 24, 2024
@JervenBolleman
Copy link
Author

In that case IMHO should still be subproperties.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants