GRSciColl suggestion - Should reviewer comment be mandatory?

[ManonGros]

This was asked by one of our contractors because it was a bit odd to comment on a suggestion from IH.
I suppose the comments don't have to be mandatory. What do you think?

Note that this is low priority

[ahakanzn]

If comments are mandatory for other suggestions I think we shouldn't change it for suggestions created by ih-sync. Are we talking about all suggestions? In that case we can change that.

[spalp]

And would it be too much trouble to separate the current field 'comment, affiliation and additional update suggestion' into:

• 'Name and affiliation' - obligatory (useful to assess credibility and to have a name when contacting them with further inquires about the suggested change)
• 'Comment and additional update suggestion' - it is fine by me not to be obligatory