-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 57
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
climate suitability calculation #131
Comments
Hi @WeirdCxychen, This type A and type B constraint are concepts under the temperature profile constraint calculation. In PyAEZ, if you activate to proceed temperature profile screening, this two constraint types are considered during thermal screening routines. Note that fc1 factor is the finalized results by selecting the most limiting value amongst the contribution of the listed thermal screening procedures (thermal climate, permafrost condition, TSUM, and temperature profile screening IF you activate these thermal screening procedures) while fc2 factor is obtained from crop water requirement calculation only for rainfed condition. Even though fc1 and fc2 factors are evaluated for every possible cycles in Module 2, for the map, the values of fc1 and fc2 are selected specifically relevant to the crop calendar date (in other words, fc1 and fc2 are the values relevant to the DOY when the maximum attainable yield is obtained (applied to both rainfed and irrigated). Hope these things clarify. Regards, Swun Wunna Htet |
Thank you for your detailed reply! |
I would like to ask if fc1 is a factor under temperature limitation, so are the fc1 values the same for irrigated and rainfed conditions? I simulated fc1 under irrigated and rainfed conditions, some raster values are the same and some raster values are different |
Hi,
After I calculated the potential yield by NB2, the fc1 and fc2 have been given corspoundingly. Could I use the 2 variables to get the suitable planting area by classifying them in 3 classes (optimum threshold, sub-optimum threshold, not suitable threshold), then use the intersection to get the final suitability evaluation?
Beyond that, I'm confused about how to decide between Type A and Type B constraint functions for calculating and classifying the suitable planting area. Or the meaning of the constraint function of Type A & B.
My purpose is to get the suitability evaluation classified as optimum, sub-optimum, not suitable, can I use the fc1 and fc2 to get it?
Regards,
XinyueC
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: