You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The supply chain module accurately represents consigners and consignees, but when middle-men shipping companies are used, the original sender and receiver are not listed on bigger packages--when many small items are boxed together for air or sea cargo--from China Air to FedEx. When a large container is broken down in a FedEx facility, the packages inside receive a new 'consigner' and 'consignee'--FedEx to John Smith.
Instead of reasoning over chains of consigners and consignees, is there a way to add a sender and receiver? Or does the ontology permit us to talk about the consigner and consignee of different levels of packaging granularity--consigner for the package, consigner for the consolidated cargo, consigner for the entire air or sea freight?
If none of this belongs, then please disregard this issue!
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The supply chain module accurately represents consigners and consignees, but when middle-men shipping companies are used, the original sender and receiver are not listed on bigger packages--when many small items are boxed together for air or sea cargo--from China Air to FedEx. When a large container is broken down in a FedEx facility, the packages inside receive a new 'consigner' and 'consignee'--FedEx to John Smith.
Instead of reasoning over chains of consigners and consignees, is there a way to add a sender and receiver? Or does the ontology permit us to talk about the consigner and consignee of different levels of packaging granularity--consigner for the package, consigner for the consolidated cargo, consigner for the entire air or sea freight?
If none of this belongs, then please disregard this issue!
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: