You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Suggestion from Johan Kluwer:
In the maintenance ontology, the OP ‘maintenance state of’ (iof-maint:maintenanceStateOf) is a subclass of ‘has participant at all times’ (obo:BFO_0000167).
I haven’t spent the time to investigate closely, but the reason is probably that some revision is happening wrt. the use or non-use of temporal relations. This means that when you open the current Maintenance ontology, you’ll actually see ‘has participant at all times’ like before, but – surely at some point the BFO in OWL at http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/bfo/2020/bfo.owl is going to be updated, and then ‘maintenance state of’ will likely not have a superproperty available, since it’s not going to be included.
Actually, I think this could best be solved by a correction in the maintenance ontology, since I think you picked the wrong inverse for ‘participates in’. The inverse is obo:BFO_0000057 (the “at some time” variant), not BFO_0000167 (“at all times”).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We think that we need a TOB decision here as iof-maint imports iof-core which imports BFO-2020-with-temporalised-relations. @wsobel - what is the plan for IOF? Are you going to continue to use temporalised relations? Please can you let us know.
That is above my pay grade. This is a TOB decision. The BFO we are using is the one in the cache bfo directory and we are using temporalized. I don’t think we’ve had a serious discussion. The core team should address this as well. That being Milos and Arco. BestW(Sent from mobile)On May 28, 2024, at 02:24, Melinda Hodkiewicz ***@***.***> wrote:
We think that we need a TOB decision here as iof-maint imports iof-core which imports BFO-2020-with-temporalised-relations. @wsobel - what is the plan for IOF? Are you going to continue to use temporalised relations? Please can you let us know.
@johanwk
—Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>
Suggestion from Johan Kluwer:
In the maintenance ontology, the OP ‘maintenance state of’ (iof-maint:maintenanceStateOf) is a subclass of ‘has participant at all times’ (obo:BFO_0000167).
The latter is not included in the latest BFO version, i.e., not in the OWL version at https://github.com/BFO-ontology/BFO-2020.
I haven’t spent the time to investigate closely, but the reason is probably that some revision is happening wrt. the use or non-use of temporal relations. This means that when you open the current Maintenance ontology, you’ll actually see ‘has participant at all times’ like before, but – surely at some point the BFO in OWL at http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/bfo/2020/bfo.owl is going to be updated, and then ‘maintenance state of’ will likely not have a superproperty available, since it’s not going to be included.
Actually, I think this could best be solved by a correction in the maintenance ontology, since I think you picked the wrong inverse for ‘participates in’. The inverse is obo:BFO_0000057 (the “at some time” variant), not BFO_0000167 (“at all times”).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: