We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
C++ has had structured bindings since C++17. https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/structured_binding
Right now hffix requires only C++98. If we were to bump that requirement to C++17, then we could design the API for structured bindings.
Then all of the field conversion methods could return tuples instead of passing the stupid return-by-reference arguments. https://jamesdbrock.github.io/hffix/classhffix_1_1field__value.html
field
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
C++ has had structured bindings since C++17. https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/structured_binding
Right now hffix requires only C++98. If we were to bump that requirement to C++17, then we could design the API for structured bindings.
Then all of the
fieldconversion methods could return tuples instead of passing the stupid return-by-reference arguments. https://jamesdbrock.github.io/hffix/classhffix_1_1field__value.htmlThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: