-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 88
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Error while connecting to ES 6.4 #355
Comments
Do you mean that there are multiple ESs? .. I don't support it. |
I'm thinking of stopping support for ES 6. Because I haven't used it at all. |
We do not support unsupported usage |
Definitely there are two seperate deployement of Paeco one for first ES server and other for 2nd ES server.. Sir you are too agressive. I am asking questions respectfully and you take it too personal . Plz relax |
Isn't it strange that it can be fixed without being able to distinguish whether the setting is wrong or a bug? .. |
Are you running on the same server? You can't tell without information about docker-compose and docker commands. I'm not a god. |
What is a separate connection to another server? .. What kind of operation was done with what kind of setting? I don't know at all. Same docker container? Does that mean? .. Is it a connection to two ESs? What I don't understand at all is the real intention. |
With only the current information, it seems that the connection is made in a strange way. |
Ok i will look into it further at my end
Arsalan Ahmed
…________________________________
From: Naoyuki Sano ***@***.***>
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2021 4:40:30 PM
To: johnsusek/praeco ***@***.***>
Cc: Arsalan Ahmed ***@***.***>; Author ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [johnsusek/praeco] Error while connecting to ES 6.4 (#355)
With only the current information, it seems that the connection is made in a strange way.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#355 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFHYIGC3PAG7II7CMOFU2X3TK7X25ANCNFSM43WTFKNA>.
|
In the first place, elastalert-server does not support multiple elasticsearch connections. So is elastalert. When I searched for elastalert issues, I've seen the answer that HAProxy should be used for ES cluster configurations. |
I am trying at all to connect to multiple ES servers.. i connecting to each server one by one.. it was working smoothly with one while failing with other.. so connection was made separately ..
Arsalan Ahmed
…________________________________
From: Naoyuki Sano ***@***.***>
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2021 4:44:10 PM
To: johnsusek/praeco ***@***.***>
Cc: Arsalan Ahmed ***@***.***>; Author ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [johnsusek/praeco] Error while connecting to ES 6.4 (#355)
In the first place, elastalert-server does not support multiple elasticsearch connections. So is elastalert. When I searched for elastalert issues, I've seen the answer that HAProxy should be used for ES cluster configurations.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#355 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFHYIGHYBNH2VNAKAF2MZQ3TK7YIVANCNFSM43WTFKNA>.
|
There is a pull request in elastalert for connecting multiple ESs, but there is currently no sign of being captured. |
Conclusion. ElastAlert and ElastAlertServer only support connecting to one ES. If it is supported, it cannot be supported unless both ElastAlert and ElastAlertServer are supported. |
No matter how much I investigated, the implementation is so, so the current situation can not be helped. |
By the way, maintenance of elastalert is stopped. |
I have two ES 6.4 databases. On one of it connects sucessfully while on other one it throws this error
Using ES python libraries i am able to connect to both and upload dataset and templates.. issue only comes with i connect via Elastalert via Praeco ..
for Elastalert i am using the docker image you shared
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: