Option to dump to folder instead?

[HackerJL]

First off, this is an amazing project, youre a wizard!

I am working on a large move from ENEX files, and the direct send to paperless is a bit painful for me (not your problem). I was wondering if there was an ability to put in a switch to do the work the program is doing, but instead, send to a subfolder vs sending to paperless. Then I can batch it up better and drop into paperless, or maybe even go direct to the paperless machine, for speed.

I know I can fork it..but this is out of my wheelhouse.

Seriously great tool, works great, just a thought.

[kevinzehnder]

Thanks, I appreciate it.

I think I've already implemented that functionality, but havent made it available. So thats an easy addon.

Storing attachements in a certain folder structure would be easy to do. What would a good output structure be though? I could just dump all attachements into a folder, or a folder per note, or something else?

[HackerJL]

In my opinion (since you asked), just a switch to specify a folder name (or it to make one...) for the entire ENEX file thats being worked on.
I guess additional options for folder per note would be wanted by some Im betting.

[kevinzehnder]

try the latest release

[HackerJL]

I was just seeing it posted (watching it). Documentation doesnt show any more switches? Whats the syntax to try?

[kevinzehnder]

Ah yes, good point. Forgot to update the Readme. If you run it with -h it'll show you all the options.

[HackerJL]

Ill try tonight!

[kevinzehnder]

works? :)

[HackerJL]

Gah. Didnt get a chance - but will. Sorry. Tomorrow - its on my list.

…

-- James D. Lainton ***@***.******@***.***>

________________________________ From: kevinzehnder ***@***.***> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2024 12:17 PM To: kevinzehnder/enex2paperless ***@***.***> Cc: James Lainton ***@***.***>; Author ***@***.***> Subject: Re: [kevinzehnder/enex2paperless] Option to dump to folder instead? (Issue #8) works? :) — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#8 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAPPS64LAITLFAYOKBTBLWTZXMIMVAVCNFSM6AAAAABM6CV7YWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGNRRHA3TCNZRGQ>. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[HackerJL]

Yes, works great, fast and easy. Many thanks.

But...We might need it to handle duplications better. While Evernote used different notes, the attachments can be duplicated. So when it hits a folder, it asks for overwrite.

My biggest issue is scanned stuff in Evernote that had the attachment 'Scanned from a Xerox Multifunction Printer.pdf'.
There is also no way to auto-accept overwrite function, so it's fairly hands on to get through the ENEX conversion.

My suggestion (that you didnt ask for...) is that it it incrementally adds a version number to the file -1, -2, etc.

But, let me be clear that it does work...wonderfully.

[kevinzehnder]

Glad to know it works, thank you.

I agree, that feature is pretty bare bones at the moment. If you have a bunch of these duplicates in an ENEX file then it definitely gets pretty tedious right now.

I think adding a -1 etc. to the files would be an option. I could also append the note title for instance, or do something with the note date. I'll think about it.