-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 187
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Need reference high available architecture for konnectivity setup #502
Comments
May releated: #394 |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle rotten |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /close not-planned |
@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue, marking it as "Not Planned". In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Currently each konnectivity agent can only connect to a single konnectivity server which makes the konnectivity server a single failure point. One option is using VIP to fail over between multiple server instances, but still the server would become the bottleneck as the cluster getting larger. Unfortunately the classic loadbalancing method won't work in-between agents and servers. There maybe edge case that one konnectivity server has no agent connected so it's actually unreachable from control plane to worker side through it, while it's not easy for apiservers to be aware of that.
Therefore, it would be good if there is kind of enhancement for the HA scenario that also support loadbalancing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: