You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
How to generate xyz_root from uv_root on evaluation set?
I have noticed that the xyz_root can be recovered from uv_root using the functions in your code (https://github.com/lmb-freiburg/freihand/blob/master/utils/model.py#L58) with 'scale' parameters which are parts of mano parameters[60]. It's obvious that such 'scale' is different from the bone length of each sample.
I want to know the exact meaning of 'scale' (mano parameter[60]). And the way to calculate xyz_root from uv_root on the evaluation set ('scale' parameter is not provided).
It seems that the root joint precision influences the final results (kp_mean_error (aligned)) on Codalab when using the Latent25D method[1]. So, it is important to generate a precise root joint for each evaluation sample. Or, the alignment on Codalab should remove the influence of xyz_root.
Thanks for any reply!!!
[1]: Iqbal et.al. Hand Pose Estimation via Latent 2.5D Heatmap Regression.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@sameeroor @moranli19
Mano_Scale means proportion between Z_{id=9,camera space} and focal length from Mano files. However another scale indicate length of idex=[9,10] from scale files.
About Mano scale, you need see source code to comprehensive.
How to generate xyz_root from uv_root on evaluation set?
I have noticed that the xyz_root can be recovered from uv_root using the functions in your code (https://github.com/lmb-freiburg/freihand/blob/master/utils/model.py#L58) with 'scale' parameters which are parts of mano parameters[60]. It's obvious that such 'scale' is different from the bone length of each sample.
I want to know the exact meaning of 'scale' (mano parameter[60]). And the way to calculate xyz_root from uv_root on the evaluation set ('scale' parameter is not provided).
It seems that the root joint precision influences the final results (kp_mean_error (aligned)) on Codalab when using the Latent25D method[1]. So, it is important to generate a precise root joint for each evaluation sample. Or, the alignment on Codalab should remove the influence of xyz_root.
Thanks for any reply!!!
[1]: Iqbal et.al. Hand Pose Estimation via Latent 2.5D Heatmap Regression.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: