We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
sample (?<throughputtime:int>[0-9]+) instead of captuing
(?<throughputtime:int>[0-9]+)
"throughputtime" => 1760
"int" => "1760"
seems to have been working (coercing) at some point around LS 1.4.2 but not since 1.5
the cause seems to be the 'optimization' in grok gem (since 0.11.0): jordansissel/ruby-grok@288fcc2#diff-0badcaad3c9a90480e7857e04b49fb3cR145
origin bug report: elastic/logstash#3557
NOTE: Grok.new is also used in multi-line - require "grok-pure" directly!
Grok.new
require "grok-pure"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
sample
(?<throughputtime:int>[0-9]+)
instead of captuing"throughputtime" => 1760
in LS 1.4.2"int" => "1760"
tested LS 6.8 and 7.7seems to have been working (coercing) at some point around LS 1.4.2 but not since 1.5
the cause seems to be the 'optimization' in grok gem (since 0.11.0):
jordansissel/ruby-grok@288fcc2#diff-0badcaad3c9a90480e7857e04b49fb3cR145
origin bug report: elastic/logstash#3557
NOTE:
Grok.new
is also used in multi-line -require "grok-pure"
directly!The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: