From c2e2edcbb09045e5d142a653a2313b2753f42ed9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Morgan Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 15:41:58 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] wrap long line lengths --- MSC_CHECKLIST.md | 11 ++++++++--- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/MSC_CHECKLIST.md b/MSC_CHECKLIST.md index 6e665e42193..30e3643600f 100644 --- a/MSC_CHECKLIST.md +++ b/MSC_CHECKLIST.md @@ -23,13 +23,18 @@ clarification of any of these points. - [ ] Does each error case have a specified `errcode` (e.g. `M_FORBIDDEN`) and HTTP status code? - [ ] If a new `errcode` is introduced, is it clear that it is new? - [ ] Will the MSC require a new room version, and if so, has that been made clear? - - [ ] Is the reason for a new room version clearly stated? For example, modifying the set of redacted fields changes how event IDs are calculated, thus requiring a new room version. + - [ ] Is the reason for a new room version clearly stated? For example, + modifying the set of redacted fields changes how event IDs are calculated, + thus requiring a new room version. - [ ] Are backwards-compatibility concerns appropriately addressed? - [ ] Are the [endpoint conventions](https://spec.matrix.org/latest/appendices/#conventions-for-matrix-apis) honoured? - [ ] Do HTTP endpoints `use_underscores_like_this`? - [ ] Will the endpoint return unbounded data? If so, has pagination been considered? - - [ ] If the endpoint utilises pagination, is it consistent with [the appendices](https://spec.matrix.org/v1.8/appendices/#pagination)? -- [ ] An introduction exists and clearly outlines the problem being solved. Ideally, the first paragraph should be understandable by a non-technical audience + - [ ] If the endpoint utilises pagination, is it consistent with [the + appendices](https://spec.matrix.org/v1.8/appendices/#pagination)? +- [ ] An introduction exists and clearly outlines the problem being solved. + Ideally, the first paragraph should be understandable by a non-technical + audience - [ ] All outstanding threads are resolved - [ ] All feedback is incorporated into the proposal text itself, either as a fix or noted as an alternative - [ ] While the exact sections do not need to be present, the details implied by the proposal template are covered. Namely: