You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi again @isiahmeadows ! I stumble upon you in many places 😄
Agree with you about oversized libs in the list!
The 5K limit is weird anyway.... The reason we want these libraries to be small is so they will load fast. This would make either 4K or 8K a better number as it aligns better with network packet sizes, disk sectors etc.
The 5K limit is weird anyway.... The reason we want these libraries to be small is so they will load fast. This would make either 4K or 8K a better number as it aligns better with network packet sizes, disk sectors etc.
Perhaps a solution could be to divide the libraries into categories like these:
Light/feather weight: Those that weigh less than 5 KB.
Medium weight: Those that weigh between 5 and 10 KB.
Heavyweight: Those that weigh more than 10 KB (maybe with a limit of up to 20 or 30 KB).
That way it wouldn't be necessary to remove what exceeds 5 KB (just recategorize it) and that would also encourage more people to submit commits of libraries that meet the other requirements except for the 5 KB limit.
Specifically these, as per the website (sizes as of March 21):
Out of these, some I know do more than one thing:
Maybe, some of these should be commented out/removed?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: