You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Great Work on the Time series enhanced by frequency information🤩! I noticed that you did not use ifft to change back in time domain, which makes me curious about the reason, it is the first time I saw people directly use the amplitude and phrase.
As the paper mentioned:
"RAINCOAT extracts the polar coordinates of frequency coefficients to keep both low-level (ai) and high-level (pi) semantics. The frequency space features eF is a concatenation [ai; pi]."
Well, I am a student now beginning to focus on Time series OOD. I want to know the low-level (ai) and high-level (pi) semantics information you mentioned means what kind of information in time series. Thesedays, I did some experiments on data augmentations for OOD Domain generalization, and I noticed that low-frequency is more important than high-frequency. I want to explore whether there are some common invariants behind the frequency domain, so the amplitude and phrase are naturally to be considered.
I think there are must some connections between low/high frequency and [amplitude and phrase], but my knowledge of maths and experimental experience is limited, I might as well take the opportunity to ask you this question🤣
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Great Work on the Time series enhanced by frequency information🤩! I noticed that you did not use
ifft
to change back in time domain, which makes me curious about the reason, it is the first time I saw people directly use the amplitude and phrase.As the paper mentioned:
Well, I am a student now beginning to focus on Time series OOD. I want to know the low-level (ai) and high-level (pi) semantics information you mentioned means what kind of information in time series. Thesedays, I did some experiments on data augmentations for OOD Domain generalization, and I noticed that low-frequency is more important than high-frequency. I want to explore whether there are some common invariants behind the frequency domain, so the amplitude and phrase are naturally to be considered.
I think there are must some connections between low/high frequency and [amplitude and phrase], but my knowledge of maths and experimental experience is limited, I might as well take the opportunity to ask you this question🤣
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: