Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mode of Inheritance classes #22

Open
mbrush opened this issue Sep 14, 2015 · 6 comments
Open

Mode of Inheritance classes #22

mbrush opened this issue Sep 14, 2015 · 6 comments

Comments

@mbrush
Copy link
Member

mbrush commented Sep 14, 2015

Ticket #2 proposes a hierarchy of mode of inheritance terms for GENO that covers diversity of concepts in this area need for data ingest and interoperability. Here we discuss the ontological nature and definitions of these concepts so that we may create a clear and useful model of them for the larger community. The central question is how to frame them - as processes of inheritance? As qualities of inheritance processes? As qualities or dispositions of the trait/phenotype itself?

Some terminological clarification first. We define the following:

  1. Trait = a characteristic that varies across organisms in a species or population (e.g. 'flower color')
  2. Phenotype = the specific values of a trait (red, pink, white, mottled flowers)
  3. Phenotype inheritance = the process by which a specific phenotype (e.g. pink flowers) is passed from one generation to the next based on the genetic interactions between alleles expressed at the responsible locus or loci (and contributions from the environment).

Approaches

  1. Framing inheritance classes as processes (i.e subtypes of a root 'phenotype inheritance process') seems a relatively simple approach and avoids delving into the historically contentious realm of dependent continuants. It would require some relation of participation between a given trait/phenotype/disease and an inheritance class. For example:
    • 'baldness' participates_in or is output_of some 'X-linked inheritance'
    • diabetes participates_in or is output_of some 'polygenic inheritance'
  2. Framing these classes as qualities of a trait or disease would mean some type of bearer_of relation between a given trait/phenotype/disease and an inheritance class. For example:
  • 'baldness' has_quality some 'X-linked inheritance'
  • diabetes has_quality some 'polygenic inheritance'
  1. Framing these classes as qualities of an inheritance process would make the link from a given trait/phenotype/disease and an inheritance class trickier to define - as the term represents a quality that inheres not in the phenotype but in the process through which the phenotype is inherited.
@mellybelly
Copy link

mellybelly commented Sep 25, 2015

I like the simplicity of (1). I feel like (2) is just odd, even though this is how it is often expressing in natural language, it really is not a quality of the phenotype itself. (3) is perhaps more ontologically correct, but very complicated to model.

If we go with (1), perhaps consider a different property, 'baldness' participates_in or is output_of some 'X-linked inheritance' seem funny, maybe it would be something more like 'baldness' inherits_over some 'X-linked inheritance' ??

@mbrush
Copy link
Member Author

mbrush commented Sep 25, 2015

Thanks for the feedback Melissa. And yes, the participates_in example above was just meant to indicate some type of participation relation is needed if we frame inheritance types as processes. Something more meaningful/precise can be used. Your thoughts on all this @cmungall and @pnrobinson?

@cmungall
Copy link
Member

process seems most extensible as its easier to slot more participants in.

How would alleles fit in, if at all? Might be useful to see some triples for Mendel's peas.

@mellybelly
Copy link

That should go in the paper!

On Sep 24, 2015, at 6:04 PM, Chris Mungall <notifications@github.commailto:notifications@github.com> wrote:

process seems most extensible as its easier to slot more participants in.

How would alleles fit in, if at all? Might be useful to see some triples for Mendel's peas.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/22#issuecomment-143095214.

@mbrush
Copy link
Member Author

mbrush commented Jun 17, 2016

Interesting examples to inform modeling from ClinGen Modeling efforts here: http://datamodel.clinicalgenome.org/development/assertion/conceptual/condition_inheritance.html

@mbrush
Copy link
Member Author

mbrush commented Sep 20, 2017

To consider:

Mode of Inheritance: Def = the disposition of a trait or condition (phenotype or disease) to manifest in an organism when a particular allelic complement is present in the host genome.

Autosomal dominant inheritance then would be defined as: A mode of inheritance whereby manifestation of a trait or condition requires inheritance of only one copy of a causative allele in an autosomal gene (i.e. the trait manifests in heterozygotes)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants