You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Everybody is talking about robustness but nobody is checking/measuring/writing/publishing about it. What it is this animal called "robustness"?
The package contains an attempted to measure it in the same way the accuracy is assessed. We understand that a model is robust if the estimates and generated results are fairly stable following gradual changes in input data or model specification.
What if the results are changing to little following a reasonable change in the input data? Is this model more robust than a model that changes in a "proportional" manner? What if the changes are to large? When is "to large" to large?
We are interested to learn about the best practices and implement them here. Help.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Everybody is talking about robustness but nobody is checking/measuring/writing/publishing about it. What it is this animal called "robustness"?
The package contains an attempted to measure it in the same way the accuracy is assessed. We understand that a model is robust if the estimates and generated results are fairly stable following gradual changes in input data or model specification.
What if the results are changing to little following a reasonable change in the input data? Is this model more robust than a model that changes in a "proportional" manner? What if the changes are to large? When is "to large" to large?
We are interested to learn about the best practices and implement them here. Help.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: