Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Retention time for spike-ins #96

Open
KarinSchork opened this issue Sep 25, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Retention time for spike-ins #96

KarinSchork opened this issue Sep 25, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
discussion Something to discuss publication

Comments

@KarinSchork
Copy link
Member

  • give retention time (and maybe total RT duration) in minutes instead of seconds?
  • retention time delta column can be confusing, especially as expected retention times are hard to determine
@KarinSchork KarinSchork added discussion Something to discuss publication labels Sep 25, 2024
@julianu
Copy link
Member

julianu commented Sep 25, 2024

  • Do we generally use minutes? Maybe wait until the mzQC hackathon and see, whether there is a defined unit.
  • total RT for the spike in? This is not monitored right now, or is it?
  • Hm, I was under the impression that exactly the delta would be the most interesting between the runs, as it directly shows you the shift from the expected value

@KarinSchork
Copy link
Member Author

  • we use seconds but @SvitiMPC said they use minutes all the time in the lab and it may be more intuitive
  • there are the columns SPIKE_MPCSPIKE2_MZ_895.9493_RT_4212_RT_at_Maximum_Intensity and the delta is the difference between that and the expected RT
  • I think the problem is that the expected RT cannot really be set accurately, especially when gradients change.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
discussion Something to discuss publication
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants