recorder and egress #418
huangshan309
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 2 comments 3 replies
-
If you compare both then you'll easily understand. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
In my opinion, the Room composite of livekit egress records a headless chrome, and plugNmeet-recorder implements similar functions, right? Although the methods are different, egress uses x11 and pulse audio, while plugNmeet-recorder uses mediarecorder, but the results are all the same, they both recording a chrome browser, so i think maybe we can use egress to implement the function of plugNmeet-recorder? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Just curious, is there any special reason not to use livekit's egress, but to implement another recorder?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions