diff --git a/assets/img/blog-2024-03-28--share.png b/assets/img/blog-2024-03-28--share.png
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..fa2a8c3d
Binary files /dev/null and b/assets/img/blog-2024-03-28--share.png differ
diff --git a/src/content/blog/2024/nf-test-in-nf-core.md b/src/content/blog/2024/nf-test-in-nf-core.md
index f649d909..f43855a9 100644
--- a/src/content/blog/2024/nf-test-in-nf-core.md
+++ b/src/content/blog/2024/nf-test-in-nf-core.md
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
 title: Leveraging nf-test for enhanced quality control in nf-core
 date: 2024-03-28
 type: post
-description: This is the first time we have a Nextflow workshop in Korea, and the feedback was amazing!
-image: img/blog-2024-03-14--share.jpg
+description: Reproducibility is an important attribute of all good science. This is especially true in the realm of bioinformatics, where software is hopefully being constantly updated, and pipelines are ideally being maintained. Improvements and maintenance are great, but they also bring about an important question: Do bioinformatics tools and pipelines continue to run successfully and produce consistent results despite these changes? Fortunately for us, there is an existing approach to ensure software reproducibility: testing.
+image: img/blog-2024-03-28--share.jpg
 tags: nextflow,nf-core,nf-test
 status: published
 author: Carson Miller & Sateesh Peri