[BUG] RO-Crate export missing MUST fields

[floWetzels]

The investigation object in the RO-Crate export does not necessarily have a license and name field, however, they are required by the RO-Crate specification.

Could the gitlab CI detect an existing license and insert it into the arc export command? @j-bauer

[feserm]

There are some available APIs to query against:

• https://github.com/licensee/licensee
• https://docs.github.com/de/rest/licenses?apiVersion=2022-11-28

When searching for license scanning and gitlab this popped up:

• https://github.com/licensee/licensee

[j-bauer]

Yes, this can be done in the CI-Pipeline. Can you point me to an example RO-Crate containing a license?

[HLWeil]

I think we don't have any example yet, @j-bauer. But as I said I could insert this as an argument in the arc-export tool, so you would only need to provide this when calling the export

[HLWeil]

name part done but license missing? @floWetzels

[floWetzels]

Correct, PR #488 changed headline to name in Investigations. Licenses are still not handled at all, as far as I know.

I guess we should also change headline to name for studies for consistency. Also, studies can be seen as their own datasets, so I guess it makes sense for them to have a name on their own. There is no field in assays though that can be mapped to name. What do you think, @HLWeil?

[HLWeil]

Yup makes sense to change them to name 👍

Would leave the Assay as is atm, maybe we actually align it more with the study, see nfdi4plants/ARC-specification#86