Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

run VEST_PA_18_replication.ipynb #8

Open
rootsmusic opened this issue Mar 6, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

run VEST_PA_18_replication.ipynb #8

rootsmusic opened this issue Mar 6, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@rootsmusic
Copy link

rootsmusic commented Mar 6, 2023

@peter-redistricting-data-hub (I don't have PA's raw-from-source files anymore,) It'd be nice to update the Validation Report. Thanks.

P.S. I assume that PA_18_ERJ.ipynb sourced from VEST's updated file, which has updated its precinct boundaries and swapped a couple precincts.

@peter-redistricting-data-hub
Copy link
Collaborator

Yup, we updated the ERJ file using VEST's updated file.

And you are taking about the PDV report?

@rootsmusic
Copy link
Author

Yes @peter-redistricting-data-hub, the Validation Report because VEST's metadata didn't highlight what's been updated in their file.

P.S. when you were working on PA_18_ERJ.ipynb, my issue alerted you about Delaware's errata. If your notebook had already corrected my issue, then it shouldn't swap the corrected precincts again when VEST realizes that issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants