You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This issue is both a request and a question.
First the question: Why the items contained in the GROUP BY block is also returned in the result.
For example the following example will return both res and value:
<< group {res = sum[t.value]} by {t.value} | t in $table$ >>
So, let's imagine value is something big to send and we don't need it, then we will have a substantial performance lose.
Is it something possible ? Maybe we can have a extra operator to say this is something to not add to the result ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When we designed group by, it simply seemed more expressive to do it that way. Do you have a realistic use-case where the grouped-over value is too large to be transmitted? In this case I guess << {foo.res} | foo in $grouped_stuff$ >> should do the job.
This issue is both a request and a question.
First the question: Why the items contained in the GROUP BY block is also returned in the result.
For example the following example will return both
res
andvalue
:So, let's imagine
value
is something big to send and we don't need it, then we will have a substantial performance lose.Is it something possible ? Maybe we can have a extra operator to say this is something to not add to the result ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: