Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support django 5.1 #72

Open
3 tasks
thclark opened this issue Oct 31, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
3 tasks

Support django 5.1 #72

thclark opened this issue Oct 31, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
feature A new feature of the app

Comments

@thclark
Copy link
Contributor

thclark commented Oct 31, 2024

Feature request

Use Case

In django 5.2, the storage settings were changed to use a STORAGES dictionary. Whilst a welcome change, because django's settings for storage were confusing and weird, this requires a change to our code which needs to be done in a backward compatible way.

The test matrix is our friend.

I'll definitely be doing this work at some point, as my django servers will inexorably march on - but presently, they're all on 4.2 LTS so if anyone needs this sooner rather than later, please either sponsor the issue (get in touch!) or raise a PR!

Supporting Octue

Octue is an Open-Source Software organisation helping you and many others to fight climate change. Providing support for your issues costs us c. 500GBP/day. Might your organisation be in a position to help sponsor this issue?

  • We already are (eg via technical partnership or GitHub Sponsors )
  • Yes (we'll prioritise this issue, and be in touch)
  • No (we'll work on this issue as and when it aligns with our core development activity)
@thclark thclark added the feature A new feature of the app label Oct 31, 2024
@thclark thclark pinned this issue Oct 31, 2024
@thclark thclark changed the title Support django 5.2 Support django 5.1 Oct 31, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature A new feature of the app
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant