You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In django 5.2, the storage settings were changed to use a STORAGES dictionary. Whilst a welcome change, because django's settings for storage were confusing and weird, this requires a change to our code which needs to be done in a backward compatible way.
The test matrix is our friend.
I'll definitely be doing this work at some point, as my django servers will inexorably march on - but presently, they're all on 4.2 LTS so if anyone needs this sooner rather than later, please either sponsor the issue (get in touch!) or raise a PR!
Supporting Octue
Octue is an Open-Source Software organisation helping you and many others to fight climate change. Providing support for your issues costs us c. 500GBP/day. Might your organisation be in a position to help sponsor this issue?
We already are (eg via technical partnership or GitHub Sponsors )
Yes (we'll prioritise this issue, and be in touch)
No (we'll work on this issue as and when it aligns with our core development activity)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Feature request
Use Case
In django 5.2, the storage settings were changed to use a
STORAGES
dictionary. Whilst a welcome change, because django's settings for storage were confusing and weird, this requires a change to our code which needs to be done in a backward compatible way.The test matrix is our friend.
I'll definitely be doing this work at some point, as my django servers will inexorably march on - but presently, they're all on 4.2 LTS so if anyone needs this sooner rather than later, please either sponsor the issue (get in touch!) or raise a PR!
Supporting Octue
Octue is an Open-Source Software organisation helping you and many others to fight climate change. Providing support for your issues costs us c. 500GBP/day. Might your organisation be in a position to help sponsor this issue?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: