You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am concerned about the precision of the current way the transformation between maps and nav graph happens for use cases with target maps that extend over several hundret meters in one direction. That means any small change in the curvature of the localization map on the robots over time (e.g. due to livelong mapping) or initial errors might cause big errors at points far away from the origin. At least that's what I'm concerned about based on what I know so far, as the RMF highway points are connected to the map via a single transform.
Is it an actual hazard and if so, are there any ideas to mitigate this drawback?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
I am concerned about the precision of the current way the transformation between maps and nav graph happens for use cases with target maps that extend over several hundret meters in one direction. That means any small change in the curvature of the localization map on the robots over time (e.g. due to livelong mapping) or initial errors might cause big errors at points far away from the origin. At least that's what I'm concerned about based on what I know so far, as the RMF highway points are connected to the map via a single transform.
Is it an actual hazard and if so, are there any ideas to mitigate this drawback?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions