-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
minor version resolution on definition server #188
Comments
|
A draft of the updated mappings is at https://github.com/opengeospatial/ogcapi-features/blob/master/specification-elements/18-058r1.csv |
Thanks @ghobona. Took the other spec like Features Core corrigendum: @ghobona @rob-metalinkage let's rephrase the question - shall be the mapping to the newest minor version automatic so we can be always up to date? or maybe there is a process already in place that shall populate it to operations and it may be leaky? |
@pzaborowski It's not currently automatic. I extract the URIs using a python script, create a CSV file, and send the CSV file to @kstegemoller for configuration of the server. In some cases, the Editors of the standards help review the CSV files. |
Currently, the definition server makes a distinction between {major}.{minor}.{patch} and {major}.{minor} when resolving URI. e.g., returns CIS document version r6 vs. To follow the policy, the 1.1.1 URI should not exist and the 1.1 URI should always resolve to the latest corrigendum version. This would also help search engine return proper results. e.g., a Google search for "OGC CIS" finds the deprecated version 1.1 (r6) rather than the proper 1.1.1 (r8). |
Hi, according to the opengeospatial/ogcapi-features#739 definition server shall resolve links to
1.0 definitions to the highest minor version 1.0.x (and all x.y to highest of x.y and x.y.z I guess).
Test case (links from 18-058r1):
Current result in the browser:
http://www.opengis.net/spec/ogcapi-features-2/1.0/req/crs -> http://docs.ogc.org/is/18-058/18-058.html#rc_crs
and
http://www.opengis.net/spec/ogcapi-features-2/1.0.1/req/crs -> http://docs.ogc.org/is/18-058r1/18-058r1.html#_requirements_class_coordinate_reference_systems_by_reference
Is the requested behaviour already documented?
Are we ok that there is no option to distinguish references to the replaced URI for externals like the software?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: