You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Wouldn't it be confusing that the years are in reverse-chronological order and the posts are in chronological order? Maybe it wouldn't; the year menu is in chronological order and the active one moves from R-to-L as you scroll down.
I suppose the way you're proposing ordering the posts kinda groups each year as its own story. I was thinking of the years more like anchors within one big story.
Wouldn't it be confusing that the years are in reverse-chronological order
and the posts are in chronological order? Maybe it wouldn't; the year menu
is in chronological order and the active one moves from R-to-L as you
scroll down.
I suppose the way you're proposing ordering the posts kinda groups each
year as its own story. I was thinking of the years more like anchors within
one big story.
Hmm…
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #9 (comment).
@andycochran what do you think about reversing the sort order within each year, so the first item as you scroll down is January, rather than December? e.g. http://openplans.github.io/history-of/#year-2009
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: