-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
limiting shift locations #22
Comments
Hi, Thank you for your question, and sorry for my very late answer. It is not possible in the current interface to limit the location of shifts to a set of specific nodes. PhyloEM shift detection algorithms and model selection procedure assume that shifts can happen anywhere on the tree, and tries to find the best possible configuration. If shifts are limited to a set of nodes, that might change the dimension of the collection of models, and possibly impacts the model selection. I don't know what is the biological question, but, just in case, if you are interested in comparing a limited set of hypothesis for shift locations, then other tools (such as mvMORPH) could be appropriate. Thanks ! |
Understood, thank you! |
Hey Pascal -- thought you might find this relevant. #23 I also came up with a work-around way to do this (and assess the resulting false positive rate) using l1ou if interested here: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.10.21.513146v1 Note that this is not exactly the same thing or truly multivariate. But I think it worked for my case. |
Is it possible to limit the locations of shifts to a set of specific nodes?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: