-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add jvm parser configuration #235
Comments
There are a number of potential solutions:
The factories are effectively shortcuts that are not intended to preclude more complex configurations. However, if you use serialization that may be a bit trickier (you may want to create your own wrapper function that uses Btw. the reason for ignoring the external entities is that this is a potential security issue. |
I agree that external entities might lead to some sort of security issues. I wasn't expecting any network communication by default at all (that led to failure in my case with incorrect url). But, looks like it's a basic behaviour for StAX and maybe disabling Anyway, thank you for your assistance. I really appreciate your work here. I think this issue can be closed. |
Hello. I use your library in one of my projects and have faced with an interesting issue.
In my case I have files with DTD declaration with wrong Url. I don't manage these files so can't remove that declaration manually. So, that incorrect declaration leads to normal work at jvm(android), native and js targets. But, plain jvm (javax.xml) fails with a valid reason
The markup declarations contained or pointed to by the document type declaration must be well-formed.
In that particular case I'm allowed to ignore that check.The problem there:
nl.adaptivity.xmlutil.StAXReader.Companion#safeInputFactory has the following code:
I can't pass any additional properties to that factory. In my case I need to set property
javax.xml.stream.supportDTD
to false (and it works via debugger).I see few ways how it might be implemented:
nl.adaptivity.xmlutil.serialization.XmlConfig.Builder
(I guess). It's gonna blow API a little but will be suitable for my case and kind of easy to implement.What do you think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: