-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Copy pathappendix01.tex
353 lines (178 loc) · 45.8 KB
/
appendix01.tex
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
\chapter{Metadata assessment bibliography}
\chapterauthor{Péter Király, Sarah Potvin, Nikos Palavitsinis, Anna Neatrour, Ayla Stein, Sara R., Juliane Stiller, Kevin Clair, Pru Mitchell, Corey Harper, Christina Harlow, Laura Akerman, Laura J. Smart, David Maus, jenyoung, Kate Flynn, leonardaa, Cassandra Baker}
This bibliography is the result of a community effort. It was built on Zotero platform as Metadata Assessment Group Library\footnote{\url{https://www.zotero.org/groups/488224/metadata_assessment}}. The bibliography was initialized by Corey Harper in February 2016, and DFL Metadata Assessment working group used for recording items found during their environmental scan. Soon Europeana Data Quality Committee also started contributing to it. During my PhD research I intensively used it as well. According to the Zotero API\footnote{\url{https://api.zotero.org/groups/488224/items}. In order to retrieve every items, one should have an API key, and should use parameters `start' and `limit' (see Zotero API documentation at \url{https://www.zotero.org/support/dev/web_api/v3/basics}.} the creators of the bibliography entries are Péter Király (94 items), Sarah Potvin (32), Nikos Palavitsinis (18), Anna Neatrour, Ayla Stein, Sara R. (7), Juliane Stiller, Kevin Clair (4), Pru Mitchell, Corey Harper, Christina Harlow, Laura Akerman, Laura J. Smart (2), David Maus, jenyoung, Kate Flynn, leonardaa. Cassandra Baker contributed with improving of existing bibliography items.
\begin{center}
*
\end{center}
\textsc{Acosta, M., Zaveri, A., Simperl, E., Kontokostas, D., Auer, S., and Lehmann, J.} 2013. Crowdsourcing Linked Data Quality Assessment. \emph{The Semantic Web – ISWC 2013}, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 8219. Heidelberg: Springer, 260–276. \url{https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41338-4_17}
\textsc{Albertoni, R., De Martino, M., and Podestà, P.} 2018. Quality measures for skos: ExactMatch linksets: an application to the thesaurus framework LusTRE. \emph{Data Technologies and Applications} \url{https://doi.org/10.1108/DTA-05-2017-0037}.
\textsc{Alemneh, D.G.} 2009. Metadata Quality Assessment: A Phased Approach to Ensuring Long-term Access to Digital Resources. \emph{Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology} \emph{46}, 1, 1–8 \url{https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.2009.1450460380}.
\textsc{Askham, N., Cook, D., Doyle, M., et al.} 2013. \emph{The Six Primary Dimensions For Data Quality Assessment. Defining Data Quality Dimensions}. DAMA UK. \url{https://www.whitepapers.em360tech.com/wp-content/files_mf/1407250286DAMAUKDQDimensionsWhitePaperR37.pdf}.
\textsc{Bade, D.} 2008. The Perfect Bibliographic Record: Platonic Ideal, Rhetorical Strategy or Nonsense? \emph{Cataloging \& Classification Quarterly} \emph{46}, 1, 109–133 \url{https://doi.org/10.1080/01639370802183081}.
\textsc{Barton, J., Currier, S., and Hey, J.M.N.} 2003. Building Quality Assurance into Metadata Creation: An Analysis based on the Learning Objects and e-Prints Communities of Practice. \emph{Papers and Project Reports for DC-2003 in Seattle, 28 September - 2 October 2003. Supporting Communities of Discourse and Practice}, 39–48 \url{http://dcpapers.dublincore.org/pubs/article/view/732}.
\textsc{Beall, J.} 2005. Metadata and Data Quality Problems in the Digital Library. \emph{Journal of Digital Information} \emph{6}, 3, 20.
\textsc{Bellini, E. and Nesi, P.} 2013. Metadata Quality Assessment Tool for Open Access Cultural Heritage Institutional Repositories. \emph{Information Technologies for Performing Arts, Media Access, and Entertainment}, Springer, 90–103. \url{https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40050-6_9}.
\textsc{Bellini, P., Bruno, I., Nesi, P., and Paolucci, M.} 2015. IPR Centered Institutional Service and Tools for Content and Metadata Management. \emph{International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering} \emph{25}, 08, 1237–1270. \url{https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218194015500242}.
\textsc{Bruce, T.R. and Hillmann, D.I.} 2004. The Continuum of Metadata Quality: Defining, Expressing, Exploiting. In: D. Hillman and E. Westbrooks, eds., \emph{Metadata in practice}. ALA Editions, Chicago, IL, 238–256. \url{http://ecommons.cornell.edu/handle/1813/7895}.
\textsc{Bruce, T.R. and Hillmann, D.I.} 2013. Metadata Quality in a Linked Data Context. \url{https://blog.law.cornell.edu/voxpop/2013/01/24/metadata-quality-in-a-linked-data-context}.
\textsc{Cai, L. and Zhu, Y.} 2015. The Challenges of Data Quality and Data Quality Assessment in the Big Data Era. \emph{Data Science Journal} \emph{14}, 2 \url{https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2015-002}.
\textsc{Cechinel, C., da Silva Camargo, S., Sánchez-Alonso, S., and Sicilia, M.-Á.} 2012. On the Search for Intrinsic Quality Metrics of Learning Objects. \emph{Metadata and Semantics Research}, Springer, 49–60 \url{https://doi.org/10/gfphbr}.
\textsc{Cechinel, C., da Silva Camargo, S., Sicilia, M.-Á., and Sánchez-Alonso, S.} 2016. Mining Models for Automated Quality Assessment of Learning Objects. \emph{Journal of Universal Computer Science} \emph{22}, 1, 94–113. \url{https://doi.org/10.3217/jucs-022-01-0094}.
\textsc{Charbonneau, M.} 2005. Production benchmarks for catalogers in academic libraries: are we there yet? \emph{Library Resources and Technical Services} \emph{49}, 1, 40–48.
\textsc{Charles, V., Stiller, J., Király, P., Bailer, W., and Freire, N.} 2018. Data Quality Assessment in Europeana: Metrics for Multilinguality. \emph{Joint Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Temporal Dynamics in Digital Libraries (TDDL 2017), the (Meta)-Data Quality Workshop (MDQual 2017) and the Workshop on Modeling Societal Future (Futurity 2017) (TDDL\_MDQual\_Futurity 2017) co-located with 21st International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (TPLD 2017), Grand Hotel Palace, Thessaloniki, Greece, 21 September 2017}, CEUR Workshop Proceedings. \url{http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2038/paper6.pdf}.
\textsc{Chen, H.-H., Wu, J., and Giles, C.L.} 2018. Compiling Keyphrase Candidates for Scientific Literature Based on Wikipedia. \emph{Joint Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Temporal Dynamics in Digital Libraries (TDDL 2017), the (Meta)-Data Quality Workshop (MDQual 2017) and the Workshop on Modeling Societal Future (Futurity 2017) (TDDL\_MDQual\_Futurity 2017) co-located with 21st International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (TPLD 2017), Grand Hotel Palace, Thessaloniki, Greece, 21 September 2017}, CEUR Workshop Proceedings. \url{http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2038/paper6.pdf}.
\textsc{Chen, Y.-N., Wen, C.-Y., Chen, H.-P., Lin, Y.-H., and Sum, H.-C.} 2011. Metrics for metadata quality assurance and their implications for digital libraries. \emph{Digital Libraries: For Cultural Heritage, Knowledge Dissemination, and Future Creation (Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Asia-Pacific Digital Libraries, 24–27 October 2011, Beijing, China.)}, Springer, 138–147. \url{http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2038/paper4.pdf}.
\textsc{Clair, K.} 2016. Technical Debt as an Indicator of Library Metadata Quality. \emph{D-Lib Magazine} \emph{22}, 11/12. \url{https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24826-9_19}.
\textsc{Clements, K., Pawlowski, J., and Manouselis, N.} 2014. Why Open Educational Resources Repositories fail - Review of Quality Assurance Approaches. \emph{EDULEARN14 Proceedings. 6th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies Barcelona, Spain, 2014}, IATED, International Association of Technology, Education and Development, 929–939. \url{https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.026}.
\textsc{Clements, K., Pawlowski, J., and Manouselis, N.} 2015. Open educational resources repositories literature review – Towards a comprehensive quality approaches framework. \emph{Computers in Human Behavior} \emph{51, Part B}, 1098–1106. \url{https://jyx.jyu.fi/dspace/handle/123456789/44031}.
\textsc{Conrad, S.} 2015. Using Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics to track DSpace metadata fields as custom dimensions. \emph{The Code4Lib Journal} 27. \url{http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/10311}.
\textsc{Debattista, J., Auer, S., and Lange, C.} 2016. Luzzu - A methodology and framework for linked data quality assessment. \emph{Journal of Data and Information Quality} \emph{8}, 1, 4:1-4:32. \url{https://doi.org/10.1145/2992786}.
\textsc{Debattista, J., Lange, C., and Auer, S.} 2014. Representing Dataset Quality Metadata using Multi-Dimensional Views. \emph{SEM ’14. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Semantic Systems}, ACM, 92–99. \url{https://doi.org/10.1145/2660517.2660525}.
\textsc{Decourselle, J., Duchateau, F., Aalberg, T., Takhirov, N., and Lumineau, N.} 2016a. Open datasets for evaluating the interpretation of bibliographic records. \emph{Proceedings of the 16th ACM/IEEE-CS on Joint Conference on Digital Libraries}, ACM, 253–254. \url{https://doi.org/10.1145/2910896.2925457}.
\textsc{Decourselle, J., Duchateau, F., Aalberg, T., Takhirov, N., and Lumineau, N.} 2016b. BIB-R: A Benchmark for the Interpretation of Bibliographic Records. \emph{Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries}, Springer International Publishing, 163–174. \url{https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43997-6}.
\textsc{Degerstedt, S. and Philipson, J.} 2016. Lessons Learned from the First Year of E-Legal Deposit in Sweden: Ensuring Metadata Quality in an Ever-Changing Environment. \emph{Cataloging \& Classification Quarterly} \emph{54}, 7, 468–482. \url{https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2016.1197170}.
\textsc{Diakopoulos, N., Friedler, S., Arenas, M., et al.} 2016. Principles for Accountable Algorithms and a Social Impact Statement for Algorithms. \url{http://www.fatml.org/resources/principles-for-accountable-algorithms}.
\textsc{DLF Aquifer Metadata Working Group and Digital Library Federation}. 2009. \emph{Digital Library Federation / Aquifer Implementation Guidelines for Shareable MODS Records, version 1.1}. Digital Library Federation. \url{https://wiki.dlib.indiana.edu/display/DLFAquifer/DLF+Aquifer+Public+Metadata+Documents?preview=/28330/120160257/DLFMODS_ImplementationGuidelines.pdf}.
\textsc{DLF/NSDL Working Group on OAI PMH Best Practices}. 2007. \emph{Best Practices for OAI PMH DataProvider Implementations and Shareable Metadata}. Digital Library Federation, Washington, D.C. \url{https://old.diglib.org/pubs/dlf108.pdf}.
\textsc{Dodds, L.} Quality Indicators for Linked Data Datasets. \url{http://answers.semanticweb.com/questions/1072/quality-indicators-for-linked-data-datasets}.
\textsc{Doorn, P. and Tsoupra, E.} 2018. A Simple Approach to Assessing the FAIRness of Data in Trusted Digital Repositories. \emph{Joint Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Temporal Dynamics in Digital Libraries (TDDL 2017), the (Meta)-Data Quality Workshop (MDQual 2017) and the Workshop on Modeling Societal Future (Futurity 2017) (TDDL\_MDQual\_Futurity 2017) co-located with 21st International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (TPLD 2017), Grand Hotel Palace, Thessaloniki, Greece, 21 September 2017}, CEUR Workshop Proceedings. \url{http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2038/invited2.pdf}.
\textsc{DPLAFest Participants}. 2015. Metadata Quality Research. \url{https://docs.google.com/document/d/15pmA276_fxShkCEagoloJwCXH89PhrF3qWBgB8xSrag/edit\#}.
\textsc{Dublin Core Metadata Initiative}. 2014. DCMI Task Group RDF Application Profiles. \url{http://wiki.dublincore.org/index.php/RDF_Application_Profiles}.
\textsc{Durco, M. and Windhouwer, M.} 2014. The CMD Cloud. \emph{Proceedings of LREC 2014}, 687–690. \url{http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2014/pdf/156_Paper.pdf}.
\textsc{Dushay, N. and Hillmann, D.I.} 2003. Analyzing Metadata for Effective Use and Re-Use. \emph{Proceedings, Dublin Core Metadata Conference, DC-2003}, Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. \url{http://dcpapers.dublincore.org/pubs/article/view/744}.
\textsc{Efron, M.} 2007. Metadata Use in OAI-Compliant Institutional Repositories. \emph{Journal of Digital Information} \emph{8}, 2. \url{http://people.ischool.illinois.edu/~mefron/papers/efron-metadatause.pdf}.
\textsc{Ellefi, M.B., Bellahsene, Z., Breslin, J., et al.} 2017. RDF Dataset Profiling - a Survey of Features, Methods, Vocabularies and Applications. \emph{Semantic Web} \emph{Preprint}, Preprint. \url{http://www.semantic-web-journal.net/content/rdf-dataset-profiling-survey-features-methods-vocabularies-and-applications}.
\textsc{Europeana Tech}. 2015. Evaluation and Enrichments Task Report Outcomes. \url{http://pro.europeana.eu/get-involved/europeana-tech/europeanatech-task-forces/evaluation-and-enrichments}.
\textsc{Färber, M., Bartscherer, F., Menne, C., and Rettinger, A.} 2017. Linked data quality of DBpedia, Freebase, OpenCyc, Wikidata, and YAGO. \emph{Semantic Web} \emph{Preprint}, Preprint, 1–53. \url{https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-170275}.
\textsc{Fischer, K.S.} 2005. Critical Views of LCSH, 1990–2001: The Third Bibliographic Essay. \emph{Cataloging \& Classification Quarterly} \emph{41}, 1, 63–109. \url{https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v41n01_05}.
\textsc{Foulonneau, M.} 2007. Information redundancy across metadata collections. \emph{Information Processing \& Management} \emph{43}, 3, 740–751. \url{http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2006.06.004}.
\textsc{Foulonneau, M. and Cole, T.W.} 2005. Strategies for Reprocessing Aggregated Metadata. \emph{Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries}, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 290–301. \url{https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Muriel_Foulonneau/publication/221176072_Strategies_for_Reprocessing_Aggregated_Metadata/links/54173a450cf2f48c74a403d1.pdf}.
\textsc{Foulonneau, M. and Riley, J.} 2008. \emph{Metadata for Digital Resources: Implementation, Systems Design and Interoperability}. Chandos Publishing, Oxford.
\textsc{Fowler, D., Barratt, J., and Walsh, P.} 2018. Frictionless Data: Making Research Data Quality Visible. \emph{International Journal of Digital Curation} \emph{12}, 2, 274–285. \url{https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v12i2.577}.
\textsc{Friesen, N.} 2004. \emph{International LOM Survey: Report (Draft)}. \url{http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/bitstream/10150/106473/1/LOM_Survey_Report2.doc}.
\textsc{Fürber, C. and Hepp, M.} 2011. Towards a Vocabulary for Data Quality Management in Semantic Web Architectures. \url{http://www.slideshare.net/cfuerber/towards-a-vocabulary-for-data-quality-management-in-semantic-web-architectures}.
\textsc{Gavrilis, D., Makri, D.-N., Papachristopoulos, L., et al.} 2015. Measuring Quality in Metadata Repositories. \emph{Proceedings from the 19th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries}, Springer, 56–67. \url{https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24592-8_5}.
\textsc{Gendered Expectations for Leadership in Libraries – In the Library with the Lead Pipe}. \url{http://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2015/libleadgender/}.
\textsc{GO FAIR Metrics Group}. FAIR Metrics. \url{http://fairmetrics.org/}.
\textsc{Gonçalves, M.A., Moreira, B.L., Fox, E.A., and Watson, L.T.} 2007. “What is a good digital library?” – A quality model for digital libraries. \emph{Information Processing \& Management} \emph{43}, 5, 1416–1437. \url{https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2006.11.010}.
\textsc{Goovaerts, M. and Leinders, D.} 2012. Metadata quality evaluation of a repository based on a sample technique. \emph{Metadata and Semantics Research}, Springer, 181–189. \url{https://doi.org/10/gfphbs}.
\textsc{Greenberg, J., Spurgin, K., and Crystal, A.} 2005. \emph{Final Report for the AMeGA (Automatic Metadata Generation Applications) Project}. \url{http://www.loc.gov/catdir/bibcontrol/lc_amega_final_report.pdf}.
\textsc{Groskopf, C.} 2015. The Quartz guide to bad data. \emph{Quartz}. \url{https://qz.com/572338/the-quartz-guide-to-bad-data/}.
\textsc{Gueguen, G.} 2019. Metadata quality at scale: Metadata quality control at the Digital Public Library of America. \emph{Journal of Digital Media Management} \emph{7}, 2, 115–126.
\textsc{Guinchard, C.} 2006. Dublin Core use in libraries: a survey. \emph{OCLC Systems \& Services: International digital library perspectives} \emph{18}, 1, 40–50. \url{https://doi.org/10.1108/10650750210418190}.
\textsc{Guy, M., Powell, A., and Day, M.} 2004. Improving the Quality of Metadata in Eprint Archives. \emph{Ariadne} 38. \url{http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue38/guy/}.
\textsc{Harper, C.} 2016. Metadata Analytics, Visualization, and Optimization: Experiments in statistical analysis of the Digital Public Library of America (DPLA). \emph{The Code4Lib Journal} 33. \url{http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/11752}.
\textsc{Haslhofer, B. and Klas, W.} 2010. A survey of techniques for achieving metadata interoperability. \emph{ACM Computing Surveys} \emph{42}, 2, 1–37. \url{https://doi.org/10.1145/1667062.1667064}. \url{https://doi.org/10.1145/1667062.1667064}.
\textsc{Hillmann, D.I.} 2008. Metadata Quality: From Evaluation to Augmentation. \emph{Cataloging \& Classification Quarterly} \emph{46}, 1, 65–80. \url{https://doi.org/10.1080/01639370802183008}.
\textsc{Hillmann, D.I., Dushay, N., and Phipps, J.} 2004. Improving Metadata Quality: Augmentation and Recombination. \url{http://www.cs.cornell.edu/naomi/DC2004/MetadataAugmentation--DC2004.pdf}.
\textsc{Höffernig, M., Orgel, T., Russegger, S., and Bailer, W.} 2015. Assessing Quality in Automated Metadata Aggregation and Mapping Services. EEXCEES, 1–6. \url{http://eexcess.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/JoanneumResearch_Assessing_Quality.pdf}.
\textsc{Höffernig, M., Orgel, T., Russegger, S., and Bailer, W.} 2013. Assessing Quality in Automated Metadata Aggregation and Mapping Services. \url{http://eexcess.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/JoanneumResearch_Assessing_Quality.pdf}.
\textsc{van Hooland, S.} 2009. Metadata Quality in the Cultural Heritage Sector: Stakes, Problems and Solutions. \url{http://homepages.ulb.ac.be/~svhoolan/these.pdf}.
\textsc{Huang, Y. and Chiang, F.} 2018. Refining Duplicate Detection for Improved Data Quality. \emph{Joint Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Temporal Dynamics in Digital Libraries (TDDL 2017), the (Meta)-Data Quality Workshop (MDQual 2017) and the Workshop on Modeling Societal Future (Futurity 2017) (TDDL\_MDQual\_Futurity 2017) co-located with 21st International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (TPLD 2017), Grand Hotel Palace, Thessaloniki, Greece, 21 September 2017}, CEUR Workshop Proceedings. \url{http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2038/paper3.pdf}.
\textsc{Hughes, B.} 2004. Metadata Quality Evaluation: Experience from the Open Language Archives Community. \emph{Digital Libraries: International Collaboration and Cross-Fertilization}, Springer, 320–329. \url{https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30544-6_34}.
\textsc{Jackson, A., Han, M.-J., Groetsch, K., Mustafoff, M., and Cole, T.W.} 2008. Dublin Core Metadata Harvested Through OAI-PMH. \emph{Journal of Library Metadata} \emph{8}, 1, 5–21. \url{https://doi.org/10.1080/10911360802076682}.
\textsc{Jay, M., Simpson, B., and Smith, D.} 2009. CatQC and Shelf-Ready Material: Speeding Collections to Users While Preserving Data Quality. \emph{Information Technology and Libraries} \emph{28}, 1, 41–48. \url{https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v28i1.3171}.
\textsc{Kaffee, L.-A., Piscopo, A., Vougiouklis, P., Simperl, E., Carr, L., and Pintscher, L.} 2017. A glimpse into babel: An analysis of multilinguality in wikidata. \emph{OpenSym ’17 Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Open Collaboration}, ACM, 14:1--14:5. \url{https://doi.org/10.1145/3125433.3125465}.
\textsc{Kaffee, L.-A. and Simperl, E.} 2018. The human face of the web of data: a cross-sectional study of labels. 66–77. \url{https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.09.007}.
\textsc{Kapidakis, S.} 2012. Comparing metadata quality in the Europeana context. \emph{PETRA ’12 Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments. Heraklion, Crete, Greece — June 06 - 08, 2012}, ACM, 25:1-25:8. \url{https://doi.org/10.1145/2413097.2413129}.
\textsc{Kapidakis, S.} 2015. Rating quality in metadata harvesting. \emph{PETRA ’15 Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments. Article No. 65. Corfu, Greece — July 01 - 03, 2015.}, ACM, 65:1-65:8. \url{https://doi.org/10.1145/2769493.2769512}.
\textsc{Kelly, B., Closier, A., and Hiom, D.} 2005. Gateway Standardization: A Quality Assurance Framework for Metadata. \emph{Library Trends} \emph{53}, 4, 637–650.
\textsc{Király, P.} 2015a. Metadata Quality Assurance Framework. \url{http://pkiraly.github.io/}.
\textsc{Király, P.} 2015b. A Metadata Quality Assurance Framework. Research plan. \url{http://pkiraly.github.io/metadata-quality-project-plan.pdf}.
\textsc{Király, P.} 2017. Towards an extensible measurement of metadata quality. \emph{DATeCH2017: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Digital Access to Textual Cultural Heritage}, ACM, 111–115. \url{https://doi.org/10.1145/3078081.3078109}.
\textsc{Király, P. and Büchler, M.} 2018. Measuring completeness as metadata quality metric in Europeana. \emph{2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data)}, IEEE, 2711–2720. \url{https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData.2018.8622487}.
\textsc{Király, P., Stiller, J., Charles, V., Bailer, W., and Freire, N.} 2019. Evaluating Data Quality in Europeana: Metrics for Multilinguality. \emph{Metadata and Semantic Research}, Springer International Publishing, 199–211. \url{https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14401-2_19}.
\textsc{Kontokostas, D., Mader, C., Dirschl, C., et al.} 2016. Semantically Enhanced Quality Assurance in the JURION Business Use Case. \emph{The Semantic Web. Latest Advances and New Domains. ESWC 2016}, Springer, 661–676. \url{https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34129-3_40}.
\textsc{Kontokostas, D., Zaveri, A., Auer, S., and Lehmann, J.} 2013. TripleCheckMate: A Tool for Crowdsourcing the Quality Assessment of Linked Data. Springer, 265–272. \url{https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41360-5_22}.
\textsc{Koster, L.} 2014. Analysing library data flows for efficient innovation. \emph{Commonplace.net}. \url{http://commonplace.net/2014/11/library-data-flows/}.
\textsc{Lagoze, C., Krafft, D.B., Jesuroga, S., Cornwell, T., Cramer, E.J., and Shin, E.} 2005. An Information Network Overlay Architecture for the NSDL. \emph{JCDL ’05 Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries}, ACM, 384–384. \url{https://doi.org/10.1145/1065385.1065487}.
\textsc{Lei, Y., Sabou, M., López, V., Zhu, J., Uren, V.S., and Motta, E.} 2006. An Infrastructure for Acquiring High Quality Semantic Metadata. \emph{The Semantic Web: Research and Applications}, Springer, 230–244. \url{https://doi.org/10.1007/11762256_19}.
\textsc{Lim, S. and Li Liew, C.} 2011. Metadata quality and interoperability of GLAM digital images. \emph{Aslib Proceedings} \emph{63}, 5, 484–498. \url{https://doi.org/10.1108/00012531111164978}.
\textsc{Lopatin, L.} Metadata Practices in Academic and Non-Academic Libraries for Digital Projects: A Survey. \emph{Cataloging \& Classification Quarterly} \emph{48}, 8, 716–742. \url{http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2010.509029}.
\textsc{Loshin, D.} 2013. Building a Data Quality Scorecard for Operational Data Governance. \url{http://www.sas.com/content/dam/SAS/en_us/doc/whitepaper1/building-data-quality-scorecard-for-operational-data-governance-106025.pdf}.
\textsc{Lovins, D. and Hillmann, D.I.} 2017. Broken-World Vocabularies. \emph{D-Lib Magazine} \emph{23}, 3/4 (March/April). \url{https://doi.org/10.1045/march2017-lovins}.
\textsc{Ma, S., Lu, C., Lin, X., and Galloway, M.} 2009. Evaluating the metadata quality of the IPL. \emph{Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology} \emph{46}, 1, 1–17. \url{https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.2009.1450460249}.
\textsc{Mader, C., Haslhofer, B., and Isaac, A.} 2012. Finding Quality Issues in SKOS Vocabularies. \emph{Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries: Second International Conference, TPDL 2012, Paphos, Cyprus, September 23-27, 2012. Proceedings}, Springer, 222–233. \url{https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33290-6_25}.
\textsc{Madnick, S.E., Wang, R.Y., Lee, Y.W., and Zhu, H.} 2009. Overview and Framework for Data and Information Quality Research. \emph{ACM Journal of Data and Information Quality} \emph{1}, 1, 1–22. \url{https://doi.org/10.1145/1515693.1516680}.
\textsc{Margaritopoulos, M., Margaritopoulos, T., Mavridis, I., and Manitsaris, A.} 2012. Quantifying and Measuring Metadata Completeness. \emph{Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology} \emph{63}, 4, 724–737. \url{https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21706}.
\textsc{Margaritopoulos, T., Margaritopoulos, M., Mavridis, I., and Manitsaris, A.} 2008. A Conceptual Framework for Metadata Quality Assessment. \url{http://dcpapers.dublincore.org/pubs/article/view/923}.
\textsc{Margaritopoulos, T., Margaritopoulos, M., Mavridis, I., and Manitsaris, A.} 2009. A Fine-Grained Metric System for the Completeness of Metadata. \emph{Conference Paper in Communications in Computer and Information Science}, Springer, 83–94. \url{https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04590-5_8}.
\textsc{Matienzo, M.A. and Rudersdorf, A.} 2014. The Digital Public Library of America Ingestion Ecosystem: Lessons Learned After One Year of Large-Scale Collaborative Metadata Aggregation. 12–23. \url{http://dcpapers.dublincore.org/pubs/article/view/3700}.
\textsc{Micic, N., Neagu, D., Campean, I.F., and Habib Zadeh, E.} 2017. Towards a Data Quality Framework for Heterogeneous Data. \url{https://bradscholars.brad.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/10454/12323/PID4808071.pdf?sequence=3\&isAllowed=y}.
\textsc{MODS Guidelines Levels of Adoption}. 2009. \emph{MODS Guidelines Levels of Adoption - American Social History Online}. \url{https://wiki.dlib.indiana.edu/display/DLFAquifer/MODS+Guidelines+Levels+of+Adoption}.
\textsc{Moen, W.E., Stewart, E.L., and McClure, C.R.} 1997. \emph{The Role of Content Analysis in Evaluating Metadata for the U.S. Government Information Locator Service (GILS): Results from an Exploratory Study Citations, Rights, Re-Use}. University of North Texas Libraries, Digital Library. \url{https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc36312/}.
\textsc{Najjar, J. and Duval, E.} 2006. Actual Use of Learning Objects and Metadata: An Empirical Analysis. \emph{TCDL Bulletin} \emph{2}, 2. \url{http://www.ieee-tcdl.org/Bulletin/v2n2/najjar/najjar.html}.
\textsc{Najjar, J., Ternier, S., and Duval, E.} 2003. The actual use of metadata in Ariadne: an empirical analysis. \emph{Proc. ARIADNE 3rd International Conference (2003)}, 6. \url{http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.93.3666\&rep=rep1\&type=pdf}.
\textsc{Neto, C.B., Kontokostas, D., Hellmann, S., Müller, K., and Brümmer, M.} 2016. Assessing Quantity and Quality of Links Between Linked Data Datasets. \emph{Proceedings of the Workshop on Linked Data on the Web co-located with the 25th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2016)}, CEUR Workshop Proceedings. \url{http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1593/#article-07}.
\textsc{Newman, D., Hagedorn, K., Chemudugunta, C., and Smyth, P.} 2007. Subject Metadata Enrichment Using Statistical Topic Models. \emph{Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries}, ACM, 366–375. \url{https://doi.org/10.1145/1255175.1255248}.
\textsc{Ngomo, A.-C.N., Auer, S., Lehmann, J., and Zaveri, A.} 2014. Introduction to Linked Data and Its Lifecycle on the Web. In: \emph{Reasoning Web. Reasoning on the Web in the Big Data Era: 10th International Summer School 2014, Athens, Greece, September 8-13, 2014. Proceedings}. Springer, Heidelberg, 1–99. \url{http://jens-lehmann.org/files/2013/reasoning_web_linked_data.pdf}.
\textsc{Nichols, D.M., McKay, D., and Twidale, M.B.} 2008. A lightweight metadata quality tool. \emph{Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries - JCDL ’08}, ACM Press, 385–388. \url{https://doi.org/10.1145/1378889.1378957}.
\textsc{Noh, Y.} 2011. A study on metadata elements for web-based reference resources system developed through usability testing. \emph{Library Hi Tech} \emph{29}, 2, 242–265. \url{https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831111138161}.
\textsc{Nomikos, V.} 2018. Repolytics: Identifying Measurable Insights for Digital Repositories. \emph{Joint Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Temporal Dynamics in Digital Libraries (TDDL 2017), the (Meta)-Data Quality Workshop (MDQual 2017) and the Workshop on Modeling Societal Future (Futurity 2017) (TDDL\_MDQual\_Futurity 2017) co-located with 21st International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (TPLD 2017), Grand Hotel Palace, Thessaloniki, Greece, 21 September 2017}, CEUR Workshop Proceedings. \url{http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2038/paper7.pdf}.
\textsc{Nwala, A.C., Weigle, M.C., and Nelson, M.L.} 2018. Bootstrapping Web Archive Collections from Social Media. \emph{Proceedings of the 29th on Hypertext and Social Media}, ACM, 64–72. \url{https://doi.org/10.1145/3209542.3209560}.
\textsc{Ochoa, X. and Duval, E.} 2009. Automatic evaluation of metadata quality in digital repositories. \emph{International Journal on Digital Libraries} \emph{10}, 2–3, 67–91. \url{https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-009-0054-4}.
\textsc{Olson, J.E.} 2003. \emph{Data Quality: The Accuracy Dimension}. Morgan Kaufmann. \url{https://books.google.com/books/about/Data_Quality.html?id=x8ahL57VOtcC}.
\textsc{Palavitsinis, N.} 2014. Metadata Quality Issues in Learning Repositories. \url{https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260424499_Metadata_Quality_Issues_in_Learning_Repositories}.
\textsc{Palavitsinis, N., Manouselis, N., and Sanchez-Alonso, S.} 2014a. Metadata quality in learning object repositories: A case study. \emph{The Electronic Library} \emph{32}, 1, 62–82. \url{https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-12-2011-0175}.
\textsc{Palavitsinis, N., Manouselis, N., and Sanchez-Alonso, S.} 2014b. Metadata quality in digital repositories: Empirical results from the cross-domain transfer of a quality assurance process: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. \emph{Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology} \emph{65}, 6, 1202–1216. \url{http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.23045}.
\textsc{Palavitsinis, N., Manouselis, N., and Sanchez-Alonso, S.} 2017. Metadata and Quality in Digital Repositories and Libraries from 1995 to 2015: A Literature Analysis and Classification. \emph{International Information \& Library Review}, 11. \url{http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2016.1278194}.
\textsc{Park, E.G.} 2007. Building interoperable Canadian architecture collections: initial metadata assessment. \emph{The Electronic Library} \emph{25}, 2, 207–218. \url{https://doi.org/10.1108/02640470710741331}.
\textsc{Park, E.G. and Richard, M.} 2011. Metadata assessment in e-theses and dissertations of Canadian institutional repositories. \emph{The Electronic Library} \emph{29}, 3, 394–407. \url{https://doi.org/10.1108/02640471111141124}.
\textsc{Park, J.} 2006. Semantic interoperability and metadata quality: an analysis of metadata item records of digital image collections. \emph{Knowledge Organization} \emph{33}, 1, 20–34.
\textsc{Park, J.} 2009. Metadata Quality in Digital Repositories: A Survey of the Current State of the Art. \emph{Cataloging \& Classification Quarterly} \emph{47}, 3–4, 213–228. \url{https://doi.org/10.1080/01639370902737240}.
\textsc{Park, J. and Yuji, T.} 2010. Metadata Quality Control in Digital Repositories and Collections: Criteria, Semantics, and Mechanisms. \emph{Cataloging \& Classification Quarterly} \emph{48}, 8, 696–715. \url{https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2010.508711}.
\textsc{Phillips, M.} 2015. Metadata Quality, Completeness, and Minimally Viable RecordsMetadata Quality, Completeness, and Minimally Viable Records. \emph{Mark E. Phillips Journal}. \url{http://vphill.com/journal/post/4075/}.
\textsc{Phipps, J., Hillmann, D.I., and Paynter, G.} 2005. Orchestrating metadata enhancement services: Introducing Lenny. \emph{Proceedings from the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, 2005}, 49–58. \url{http://dcpapers.dublincore.org/pubs/article/view/803}.
\textsc{Pirmann, C.} 2009. Alternative Subject Languages for Cataloging. \url{http://courseweb.lis.illinois.edu/~pirmann2/LIS577/toolbox/langhead.html}.
\textsc{Radulovic, F., Mihindukulasooriya, N., García-Castro, R., and Gómez-Pérez, A.} 2017. A comprehensive quality model for Linked Data. \emph{Semantic Web} \emph{Preprint}, Preprint, 1–22. \url{https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-170267}.
\textsc{Rasaiah, B.A., Jones, Simon.D., Bellman, C., Malthus, T.J., and Hueni, A.} 2015. Assessing field spectroscopy metadata quality. \emph{Remote Sensing} \emph{7}, 4, 4499–4526. \url{https://doi.org/10/gfphbq}.
\textsc{Reiche, K. and Höfig, E.} 2013. Implementation of Metadata Quality Metrics and Application on Public Government Data. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 236–241. \url{https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSACW.2013.32}.
\textsc{Reiche, K., Höfig, E., and Schieferdecker, I.} 2014. Assessment and Visualization of Metadata Quality for Open Government Data. \emph{CeDEM14. Conference for E-Democracy and Open Governement}, Edition Donau-Universität Krems, 335–346. \url{http://www.donau-uni.ac.at/imperia/md/content/department/gpa/zeg/bilder/cedem/cedem14/cedem14_proceedings_1st_edition.pdf}.
\textsc{Reiche, K.J.} 2013. Assessment and Visualization of Metadata Quality for Open Government Data. \url{http://www.inf.fu-berlin.de/inst/ag-se/theses/Reiche13-metadata-quality.pdf}.
\textsc{Rennau, H.-J.} 2017. Location trees enable XSD based tool development. \emph{XML London 2017 Conference Proceedings}, XML London, 20–37. \url{https://doi.org/10.14337/XMLLondon17.Rennau01}.
\textsc{Rizza, E., Chardonnens, A., and van Hooland, S.} 2019. Close-reading of Linked Data: a case study in regards to the quality of online authority files. \emph{arXiv e-prints}. \url{https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.02140}.
\textsc{Robertson, J.R.} 2005. Metadata quality: implications for library and information science professionals. \emph{Library Review} \emph{54}, 5, 295–300. \url{https://doi.org/10.1108/00242530510600543}.
\textsc{Rula, A. and Zaveri, A.} 2014. Methodology for Assessment of Linked Data Quality. \emph{Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Linked Data Quality}, CEUR. \url{http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1215/paper-04.pdf}.
\textsc{Shreeves, S.L., Kaczmarek, J.S., and Cole, T.W.} 2003. Harvesting cultural heritage metadata using the OAI Protocol. \emph{Library Hi Tech} \emph{21}, 2, 159–169. \url{https://doi.org/10.1108/07378830310479802}.
\textsc{Shreeves, S.L., Knutson, E.M., Stvilia, B., Palmer, C.L., Twidale, M.B., and Cole, T.W.} 2005. Is “Quality” Metadata “Shareable” Metadata? The Implications of Local Metadata Practices for Federated Collections. \emph{Currents and Convergence: Navigating the Rivers of Change. ACRL Twelfth National Conference.}, Association of College \& Research Libraries, 223–237. \url{https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/145/shreeves05.pdf}.
\textsc{Sicilia, M.A., Garcia, E., Pages, C., Martinez, J.J., and Gutierrez, J.M.} 2005. Complete metadata records in learning object repositories: some evidence and requirements. \emph{International Journal of Learning Technology} \emph{1}, 4, 411–424. \url{https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLT.2005.007152}.
\textsc{Simon, A., Vila Suero, D., Hyvönen, E., et al.} 2014. \emph{EuropeanaTech Task Force on a Multilingual and Semantic Enrichment Strategy: final report}. Europeana. \url{http://pro.europeana.eu/get-involved/europeana-tech/europeanatech-task-forces/multilingual-and-semantic-enrichment-strategy}.
\textsc{Simons, G., ed.} 2009. Open Language Archives Community (OLAC) Metadata Metrics. \url{http://www.language-archives.org/NOTE/metrics.html}.
\textsc{Snow, K.} 2017. Defining, Assessing, and Rethinking Quality Cataloging. \emph{Cataloging \& Classification Quarterly}, 1–18. \url{https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2017.1350774}.
\textsc{Soto-Hernández, S. and Naumis-Peña, C.} Metadata in Mexican Television News Broadcasts on the Web. \emph{Joint Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Temporal Dynamics in Digital Libraries (TDDL 2017), the (Meta)-Data Quality Workshop (MDQual 2017) and the Workshop on Modeling Societal Future (Futurity 2017) (TDDL\_MDQual\_Futurity 2017) co-located with 21st International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (TPLD 2017), Grand Hotel Palace, Thessaloniki, Greece, 21 September 2017}, CEUR Workshop Proceedings. \url{http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2038/paper5.pdf}.
\textsc{Stiller, J. and Király, P.} 2017. Multilinguality of Metadata. Measuring the Multilingual Degree of Europeana’s Metadata. \emph{Everything Changes, Everything Stays the Same? Understanding Information Spaces. Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium of Information Science (ISI 2017)}, Verlag Werner Hülsbusch, 164–176. \url{https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314879735_Multilinguality_of_Metadata_Measuring_the_Multilingual_Degree_of_Europeana%27s_Metadata}.
\textsc{Stvilia, B. and Gasser, L.} 2008. Value-based metadata quality assessment. \emph{Library \& Information Science Research} \emph{30}, 1, 67–74. \url{https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2007.06.006}.
\textsc{Stvilia, B., Gasser, L., Twidale, M.B., Shreeves, S.L., and Cole, T.W.} 2004. Metadata quality for federated collections. \emph{Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Information Quality (ICIQ-04)}, 111–125. \url{http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.552.1921\&rep=rep1\&type=pdf}.
\textsc{Stvilia, B., Gasser, L., Twidale, M.B., and Smith, L.C.} 2007. A framework for information quality assessment. \emph{Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology} \emph{58}, 12, 1720–1733. \url{https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20652}.
\textsc{Stvilia, B., Hinnant, C., Wu, S., et al.} 2015. Research project tasks, data, and perceptions of data quality in a condensed matter physics community. \emph{Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology} \emph{66}, 2, 246–263. \url{https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23177}.
\textsc{Suominen, O. and Hyvönen, E.} 2012. Improving the Quality of SKOS Vocabularies with Skosify. \emph{Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management: 18th International Conference, EKAW 2012, Galway City, Ireland, October 8-12, 2012.}, Springer, 383–397. \url{https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33876-2_34}.
\textsc{Suominen, O. and Mader, C.} 2014. Assessing and Improving the Quality of SKOS Vocabularies. \emph{Journal on Data Semantics} \emph{3}, 1, 47–73. \url{https://doi.org/10.1007/s13740-013-0026-0}.
\textsc{Szostak, R., Scharnhorst, A., Beek, W., and Smiraglia, R.P.} 2018. Connecting KOSs and the LOD Cloud. \emph{arXiv:1802.08141 [cs]}. \url{http://arxiv.org/abs/1802.08141}.
\textsc{Tallerås, K.} 2017. Quality of Linked Bibliographic Data: The Models, Vocabularies, and Links of Data Sets Published by Four National Libraries. \emph{Journal of Library Metadata} \emph{17}, 2, 126–155. \url{https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2017.1355166}.
\textsc{Tallerås, K., Dahl, J.H.B., and Pharo, N.} 2018. User conceptualizations of derivative relationships in the bibliographic universe. \emph{Journal of Documentation} \emph{74}, 4, 894–916. \url{https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-10-2017-0139}.
\textsc{Tallerås, K., Massey, D., Dahl, J.H.B., and Pharo, N.} 2013. Ordo ad chaos – Linking Norwegian black metal. In: S.K. Nilsson and A. Frenander, eds., \emph{Libraries, black metal and corporate finance: Current research in Nordic Library and Information Science}. University of Borås, Borås, 136–150. \url{https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:883968/FULLTEXT01.pdf}.
\textsc{Tani, A., Candela, L., and Castelli, D.} 2013. Dealing with metadata quality: The legacy of digital library efforts. \emph{Information Processing \& Management} \emph{49}, 6, 1194–1205. \url{https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2013.05.003}.
\textsc{Tarver, H., Phillips, M., Zavalina, O., and Kizhakkethil, P.} 2015. An Exploratory Analysis of Subject Metadata in the Digital Public Library of America. \emph{Proceedings from the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications 2015}, Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, 30–40. \url{https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc725779/}.
\textsc{Tarver, H., Zavalina, O., Phillips, M., Alemneh, D.G., and Shakeri, S.} 2014. How Descriptive Metadata Changes in the UNT Libraries’ Collection: A Case Study. \emph{Proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications}, Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, 43–52. \url{http://dcevents.dublincore.org/IntConf/dc-2014/paper/view/235}.
\textsc{Tcholtchev, N.} 2014. Visualization of Metadata Quality for Open Government Data. \url{http://www.slideshare.net/dgpazegovzpi/konrad-cedem-praesi}.
\textsc{Thomas, S.E.} 1996. Quality in Bibliographic Control. \emph{Library Trends} \emph{44}, no.3 (winter 1996), 491–505.
\textsc{Tönnies, S.} 2012. Quality Control using Semantic Technologies in Digital Libraries. \url{https://publikationsserver.tu-braunschweig.de/receive/dbbs_mods_00046510}.
\textsc{Tönnies, S. and Balke, W.-T.} 2009. Using Semantic Technologies in Digital Libraries - A Roadmap to Quality Evaluation. \emph{Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries. ECDL 2009.}, Springer, 168–179. \url{http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-581/gvd2010_6_3.pdf}.
\textsc{Tönnies, S. and Balke, W.-T.} 2010. Quality Assessment in Digital Libraries - Challenges and Chances. \emph{Proceedings of the 22. GI-Workshop on Foundations of Databases (Grundlagen von Datenbanken)}, CEUR Workshop Proceedings. \url{https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04346-8_18}.
\textsc{Trippel, T., Broeder, D., Durco, M., and Ohren, O.} 2014. Towards automatic quality assessment of component metadata. \emph{Proceedings of LREC 2014}, 3851–3856. \url{http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0024-3233-2}.
\textsc{Tsiflidou, E. and Manouselis, N.} 2013. Tools and Techniques for Assessing Metadata Quality. \emph{Metadata and Semantics Research: Proceedings of the 7th Research Conference, MTSR 2013, Thessaloniki, Greece, November 19-22, 2013.}, Springer, 99–110. \url{https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03437-9_11}.
\textsc{Van Kleeck, D., Langford, G., Lundgren, J., Nakano, H., O’Dell, A.J., and Shelton, T.} 2016. Managing Bibliographic Data Quality in a Consortial Academic Library: A Case Study. \emph{Cataloging \& Classification Quarterly} \emph{54}, 7, 452–467. \url{https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2016.1210709}.
\textsc{Vassilakaki, E. and Garoufallou, E.} 2013. Multilingual Digital Libraries: A review of issues in system-centered and user-centered studies, information retrieval and user behavior. \emph{International Information \& Library Review} \emph{45}, 1–2, 3–19. \url{https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iilr.2013.07.002}.
\textsc{Ward, J.H.} 2002. A Quantitative Analysis of Dublin Core Metadata Element Set (DCMES) Usage in Data Providers Registered with the Open Archives Initiative (OAI). \url{http://ils.unc.edu/MSpapers/2816.pdf}.
\textsc{Welsh, A.} 2016. The Rare Books Catalog and the Scholarly Database. \emph{Cataloging \& Classification Quarterly} \emph{54}, 5–6, 317–337. \url{https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2016.1188433}.
\textsc{Westbrook, R.N., Johnson, D., Carter, K., and Lockwood, A.} 2012. Metadata Clean Sweep: A Digital Library Audit Project. \emph{D-Lib Magazine} \emph{18}, 5/6. \url{https://doi.org/10.1045/may2012-westbrook}.
\textsc{Young, J.Y., Westbrook, J.D., Feng, Z., et al.} 2017. OneDep: Unified wwPDB System for Deposition, Biocuration, and Validation of Macromolecular Structures in the PDB Archive. \emph{Structure} \emph{25}, 3, 536–545. \url{https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2017.01.004}.
\textsc{Zavalina, O.L.} 2014. Complementarity in Subject Metadata in Large-Scale Digital Libraries: A Comparative Analysis. \emph{Cataloging \& Classification Quarterly} \emph{52}, 1, 77–89. \url{https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2013.848316}.
\textsc{Zavalina, O.L., Kizhakkethil, P., Alemneh, D.G., Phillips, M.E., and Tarver, H.} 2015a. Building a Framework of Metadata Change to Support Knowledge Management. \emph{Journal of Information \& Knowledge Management} \emph{14}, 01, 1550005-1-1550005–16. \url{https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219649215500057}.
\textsc{Zavalina, O.L., Kizhakkethil, P., and Shakeri, S.} 2015b. Metadata change in traditional library collections and digital repositories: Exploratory comparative analysis. \emph{Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology} \emph{52}, 1, 1–5. \url{https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2015.1450520100146}.
\textsc{Zavalina, O.L., Shakeri, S., Kizhakkethil, P., and Phillips, M.E.} 2018. Uncovering Hidden Insights for Information Management: Examination and Modeling of Change in Digital Collection Metadata. \emph{Transforming Digital Worlds}, Springer International Publishing, 645–651. \url{https://doi.org/10/gfphbt}.
\textsc{Zavalina, O.L., Zavalin, V., Shakeri, S., and Kizhakkethil, P.} 2016. Developing an Empirically-based Framework of Metadata Change and Exploring Relation between Metadata Change and Metadata Quality in MARC Library Metadata. \emph{Procedia Computer Science} \emph{99}, 50–63. \url{https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.100}.
\textsc{Zaveri, A., Kontokostas, D., Sherif, M.A., Bühmann, L., Morsey, M., and Auer, S.} 2013. User-driven quality evaluation of DBpedia. \emph{Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Semantic Systems}, ACM, 97–104. \url{https://doi.org/10.1145/2506182.2506195}.
\textsc{Zaveri, A., Rula, A., Maurino, A., Pietrobon, R., Lehmann, J., and Auer, S.} 2016. Quality assessment for Linked Data: A Survey. \emph{Semantic Web} \emph{7}, 1, 63–93. \url{https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-150175}.
\textsc{Zeitlyn, D. and Beardmore-Herd, M.} 2018. Testing Google Scholar bibliographic data: Estimating error rates for Google Scholar citation parsing. \emph{First Monday} \emph{23}, Number 11-5 November 2018. \url{https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v23i11.8658}.
\textsc{Zeng, M.L., Subrahmanyam, B., and Shreve, G.M.} 2004. Metadata Quality Study for the National Science Digital Library (NSDL) Metadata Repository. \emph{Digital Libraries: International Collaboration and Cross-Fertilization}, Springer, 339–340. \url{https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30544-6_36}.