-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 250
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Installation flow is non-trivial and unclear #660
Comments
Would it work to install from the 20.10 repos, as suggested in this post on askubuntu.com? https://askubuntu.com/a/1298985/244753
|
Thanks, @martinmagnusson, I may try that in a VM when I finish my migration to 20.04, just for the sake of people checking this ticket. For anything not coming straight from the distribution repositories, I've promised myself to stick with flatpak, AppImage, snap, nix packages or very mainstream PPAs. I'm too old to spend time chasing broken dependencies :) Also, that would get me version 3, not version 2. Personally, I've switched to a proprietary (gasp) solution that works out of the box and albeit not nearly as good as the old Hamster, it's looking more usable for my needs than the new version. |
I've recently started using hamster again and it was a bit of a hassle to get it running for me as well. What would be the necessary steps to get hamster published on Flathub? Can I help? |
It's a bit of known issue that installing hamster is a pain currently, especially since it dropped out of most distros between 2.x and 3.0. I would like to see this improved, though it's one of many things that we need to get sorted out... As for the flatpak being hard to find, that would be something that we could fix in the README. Also, flatpak support is rather new (not yet part of any release), so starting with the next release we should probably also upload a flatpak build along with releases (not sure if the current GH actions integration handles this already).
I'm quite unfamiliar with the Flathub ecosystem, so I can't really answer this. @tchernobog and @bochecha have been working on Flatpak support before, maybe they can comment here? As for the extension and the mess on extensions.gnome.org, see projecthamster/hamster-shell-extension#304 Just some thoughts on this issue. |
Yes, that was the original idea: the next release should, alongside the source .zip and .tar.gz files, provide also the .flatpak file. Then it'd be readily available and discoverable.
Getting it into flathub would mostly be a question of writing the appstream metadata file, adjusting the flatpak manifest ever so slightly to download Hamster's sources from a known URL instead of from a local folder, and submitting a PR against the relevant repository. Those are all easy steps. However, a maintainer of Hamster should branch the flathub repo as part of projecthamster here on GitHub, and create the
Just FYI, since we're talking about Flatpak: there is no plan to support GNOME Shell extensions within the flatpak. Also, starting from GNOME 40, they need to be migrated to Gtk 4 if they have preferences. |
Hi, I'm a Ubuntu 20.04 user and I've tried to install Hamster 3.0.2 with snap, with both the command line and the graphical software center, to no avail (it seems there is no apt package available, although I'm not certain). The farthest I get is (with the snap cli) a Hamster window, but then I cannot seem to do anything (the "track" button is greyed out or not responsive, and nothing happens otherwise. With the graphical center, after a seemingly successful install (and all the permissions set), I get nothing at all, just a icon that doesn't pop any window or error message whatsoever. Any guidance would be appreciated. |
@cjauvin I'm on the same OS as you, this is how I'm currently using Hamster:
|
@matthijskooijman would it make sense to do a new minor release out of master, to expose the flatpak artifact publicly? It would greatly help discoverability while we think about how to proceed. |
I'm going to start by apologizing to the good people doing hard work to keep Hamster alive: this issue will not be the most helpful and may sound like a rant. My purpose is only to give feedback about what is potentially a common blocking point.
I'm now migrating from Ubuntu 16.04 to 20.04 (technically Pop!_OS 20.04, which is a variant of Ubuntu, so I wouldn't be surprised if the problems apply equally to Ubuntu). I've depended on Hamster for time-tracking for close to 10 years. In a perfect world Hamster would just keep working as it was forever but perusing this repo I've understood that there was unavoidable rework due to the necessary migrations to gtk3 and python3.
So I've been trying to get Hamster running on 20.04 and with Gnome Shell integration and it is far from straightforward. Since this is an LTS release for the most common Linux distro, it would maybe be good for a project to have a working "happy path" for this case. This is the only reason I'm reporting my troubles.
What would have helped
I think the best bang for the buck at this point for the devs and the users would be to make the package available in Flathub, have a working extension up on the Gnome Shell extensions website, and make sure that both work together. From what I could muster in different tickets it seems that you're very close to achieving this.
What I have tried
org.gnome.Platform
package. I will not add the duplicate remote because as indicated in the flatpak ticket above this tends to mess up one's flatpak installation.(*) I admit that I was not terribly excited from what I've seen from the v3 snap, so my enthusiasm to get Hamster properly set up has deflated: no more click and drag on the graph to add entries, no more bar graph with total time by day, no clicking on categories to filter, no independent auto-complete for categories after the '@', no more idle time detection... I'm sure there are very good reasons for these changes but unfortunately they severely reduce the utility of the app for my use case. This is why I'm no longer trying the install and looking for alternatives.
I hope you're not dispirited by this kind of comment, your work is praiseworthy and I hope that you'll be successful in your effort to get Hamster back in working condition. I'm sorry I cannot contribute with code rather than rants, but I'm quite busy right now and all these packaging technologies are totally foreign to me. I'm sure I'll keep checking back with the project and hopefully contribute with actual code in the next downtime.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: