We should not assume users want to add a reply #4227
-
We currently assume when the user clicks on a comment that they want to leave a reply. Because of this, we open the reply editor and focus in it. What I'm finding is that most of the time, i'm clicking the comment with the goal of seeing what the app looked like at that point or right after. This means i often click the comment and then press the space bar. Today, this feels like a bug because i expect the video to play, but instead i'm leaving a comment. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 4 comments 5 replies
-
I agree. The click -> focus on the textbox is a little big aggressive. Taking two clicks to navigate to a comment and add a reply is reasonable. If we really do want a one-click-to-start-leaving-a-reply experience, we should:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Somewhat related: #4229 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Yeah, I know I've been trying different things out with focus and auto-opening/closing, but I do think in general it's better to lean towards the "dumber" way to do things (buttons, things not appearing/disappearing). I think the place where this breaks down is when a UI item is so general-purpose that you can reasonably come up with a list of 15 things that a user wants to do with an item. In our case, I don't think we have that problem. For me, comments are primarily used to:
I think Editing/Deleting happens a lot for me because I QA a lot, most likely people are navigating much of the time, adding replies less often (do we have data on this? Would be awesome to know how many clicks on comments led to replies, how much do people click on their own comments, etc.), and deleting/editing even less often. I think personally, I'm in favor of having clicking on a card always mean seeking to that point. This is consistent with the console. I think, as @jaril mentioned, adding a reply should be a button, near the bottom where you would expect to type a reply. Personally I would probably lean towards always visible, if a little subtle, but maybe that's just because I'm from the 90's. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
As of March 7 2022, pretty sure we've addressed this? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
As of March 7 2022, pretty sure we've addressed this?