We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
This can be added to the "Place" update project, but putting it here so I don't forget about it.
When attaching a record to a Place authority, the record does not show any qualifying information about that place.
So this person:
https://muscat.rism.info/admin/people/41022026
Was born in "London" (551 $a), and this person:
https://muscat.rism.info/admin/people/7421
Died in "London".
But by looking at the record there's no way of telling that these are two different Londons -- the first in Canada, the second in the UK.
The MARC21 docs say that for the X51 fields, all qualifying information should be added in parentheses and not in subfields.
"$a - Geographic name Parenthetical qualifying information is not separately subfield coded."
So from the Place authority if we have:
This should probably be in the MARC record as 551 $aLondon (Ontario, Canada).
551 $aLondon (Ontario, Canada)
BUT, I know this will probably cause all sorts of problems linking the two records, since the value of 551 $a would differ from the Place Name field.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
This can be added to the "Place" update project, but putting it here so I don't forget about it.
When attaching a record to a Place authority, the record does not show any qualifying information about that place.
So this person:
https://muscat.rism.info/admin/people/41022026
Was born in "London" (551 $a), and this person:
https://muscat.rism.info/admin/people/7421
Died in "London".
But by looking at the record there's no way of telling that these are two different Londons -- the first in Canada, the second in the UK.
The MARC21 docs say that for the X51 fields, all qualifying information should be added in parentheses and not in subfields.
"$a - Geographic name
Parenthetical qualifying information is not separately subfield coded."
So from the Place authority if we have:
This should probably be in the MARC record as
551 $aLondon (Ontario, Canada)
.BUT, I know this will probably cause all sorts of problems linking the two records, since the value of 551 $a would differ from the Place Name field.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: