You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 19, 2022. It is now read-only.
Thank you very much for making this tool available to public.
I am trying to better understand the results generated by this tool, and noticed in XSENS MTI-G-710 acceleration graph the line with -1/2 slope is fitting to Allan variance graph pretty well, but the line with the slope +1/2 is not fitting at all. Why does this tool insist on fitting a +1/2 line to the graph while the empirical data just doesn't look like a +1/2 line? Is the calculated random walk in this graph really useful?
Thank you very much,
Ahmad
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Hello,
Thank you very much for making this tool available to public.
I am trying to better understand the results generated by this tool, and noticed in XSENS MTI-G-710 acceleration graph the line with -1/2 slope is fitting to Allan variance graph pretty well, but the line with the slope +1/2 is not fitting at all. Why does this tool insist on fitting a +1/2 line to the graph while the empirical data just doesn't look like a +1/2 line? Is the calculated random walk in this graph really useful?
Thank you very much,
Ahmad
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: