Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Usability: edit command consistency with in/out #103

Open
hoxu opened this issue Sep 3, 2014 · 1 comment
Open

Usability: edit command consistency with in/out #103

hoxu opened this issue Sep 3, 2014 · 1 comment
Labels
in consideration Describes a feature worth taking into account waiting for PR

Comments

@hoxu
Copy link

hoxu commented Sep 3, 2014

After using these commands all the time:

t in --at time
t out --at time

I keep writing these and expecting them to work:

t edit --in time
t edit --out time

Alas, the actual options are --start and --end (consistent with other commands though!), so I only end up overwriting the entry message.

Would it be possible to have --in and --out options work as --start and --end (perhaps even for all commands?), or alternatively make edit refuse to use unknown options as edited message (for example by requiring " -- " before text that begins "--something"?

@samg
Copy link
Owner

samg commented Sep 6, 2014

I think it seems reasonable to add --in and --out as aliases to --start and --end for the edit command. I may have time to add this feature at some point, but would also happily accept a pull request.

Thanks!

@categulario categulario added in consideration Describes a feature worth taking into account waiting for PR labels May 12, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
in consideration Describes a feature worth taking into account waiting for PR
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants