Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider using a namespace package approach for operator plugins #425

Open
abingham opened this issue Feb 20, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Consider using a namespace package approach for operator plugins #425

abingham opened this issue Feb 20, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@abingham
Copy link
Contributor

For operator plugins we currently have a notion of "operator providers" since enumerating all of the operators with entry-points would be tedious (perhaps not even possible...some are dynamically generated). This extra level of indirection is a bit confusing/non-obvious, though, so perhaps we should use an extensible namespace package for operators. It's certainly not critical, but worth a thought.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant