You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We've ignored phi_0 and phi_1 (the two ends in Gibbs measure) so far, because the sequence is usually long enough. However if we analyze multi-species data, the boundaries of blocks cannot be ignored anymore. We might need to find a way to parameterize duplet rates but I'm not sure if it's the best way, because it introduces more parameters (something similar to "baseline" parameters).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We've ignored
phi_0
andphi_1
(the two ends in Gibbs measure) so far, because the sequence is usually long enough. However if we analyze multi-species data, the boundaries of blocks cannot be ignored anymore. We might need to find a way to parameterize duplet rates but I'm not sure if it's the best way, because it introduces more parameters (something similar to "baseline" parameters).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: