From c80d731a6b4c4e4108834513c5de982b6825fd76 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Vorel Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 00:06:03 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Fix formatting Missing blank line caused list not be recognized. Although '*' (star) would be working for markdown list, convert it to '-' (dash) because other lists on the page use it. Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel --- functional-differences-from-glibc.md | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/functional-differences-from-glibc.md b/functional-differences-from-glibc.md index 90ac8b5..a7ee46a 100644 --- a/functional-differences-from-glibc.md +++ b/functional-differences-from-glibc.md @@ -361,10 +361,11 @@ difference prevented the use of larger packets produced by protocols such as DNSSEC and DKIM. musl also does not implement the following glibc bugs: -* When the `hints` parameter for `getaddrinfo` is unset, glibc sets the + +- When the `hints` parameter for `getaddrinfo` is unset, glibc sets the `ai_protocol` field, which is [non-complaint](https://github.com/libuv/libuv/issues/2225#issuecomment-765808228). -* When `getaddrinfo` is called with `AF_UNSPEC`, glibc returns a result +- When `getaddrinfo` is called with `AF_UNSPEC`, glibc returns a result even if one of the address families returns `ServFail`. This is a bug (glibc #27929) and may undermine DNSSEC.