You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I notice that the number of kernels used in the convolutional layer of the alexnet_benchmark sample are different from the number specified in the Alexnet paper. So I am just curious to know the reason for doing so?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Because it's Alexnet from the "One weird trick" paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/1404.5997. Classic AlexNet 2-column topology was caused by him using 2 GPUs with 3GB RAM each (maximum at the time). As GPUs with more RAM appeared, it was replaced by simpler and better performing 1-column Alexnet. There is really no reason to benchmark 2-column classic Alexnet, except to preserve historic continuity, which often [accidentally] happens when people run Caffenet (since it's included with Caffe.
I notice that the number of kernels used in the convolutional layer of the alexnet_benchmark sample are different from the number specified in the Alexnet paper. So I am just curious to know the reason for doing so?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: