Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Poor speeds with latest config #26

Open
krisclarkdev opened this issue Apr 3, 2019 · 4 comments
Open

Poor speeds with latest config #26

krisclarkdev opened this issue Apr 3, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@krisclarkdev
Copy link

Hey man, nice work with these configs for Google. I just wanted to let you know that whatever was changed between this config

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/stevejenkins/UBNT-EdgeRouter-Example-Configs/f3b829bdfc8dc8322fe8734c6ca73caebf715c73/Google-Fiber/config.boot.poe

And your latest has some sort of impact on the speeds. It dropped me from 900+ Mpbs down and up to 50Mbps.

You can see more details here https://www.reddit.com/r/Ubiquiti/comments/b90yd3/edgerouter_poe_poor_performance_help/

@rprimus
Copy link

rprimus commented Apr 4, 2019

Thu Apr 4 11:38:02 BST 2019

@krisclarkdev

running vimdiff on the two configs:

original config: /prefix-length 56
new config: /prefix-length 64

@krisclarkdev
Copy link
Author

Would this impact speed though?

@Alexia
Copy link

Alexia commented Jan 10, 2020

I believe there is some merit to this. I was getting 700/300 on an EdgeRouter 10X. Changing the prefix length to 56 bumped that up to 900/450.

@stevenboyd78
Copy link

stevenboyd78 commented Jan 24, 2020

I was adding the ipv6 stuff to my existing configuration and found that with using /64 I was only able to setup 1 of the pd interfaces. I kept getting an "prefix-id must be less than :: for prefix /64" error. Switching to /56 resolved that issue and allowed me to commit the 2nd interface.

This is what I was able to succeed with http://vps.theboyd.us/ubnt_google_ipv6_conf.txt

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants