Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Track] ensure compliance to the CNCF to get machine sponsorship from external #1914

Open
6 tasks
sunya-ch opened this issue Jan 22, 2025 · 0 comments
Open
6 tasks
Assignees
Labels
discussion Need more discussion metal-ci This issue is related to kepler-metal-ci

Comments

@sunya-ch
Copy link
Collaborator

sunya-ch commented Jan 22, 2025

Currently in kepler-metal-ci project, CI for training and validating kepler power model, we have Equinix metal server sponsored by CNCF and AWS e2 instance from @rootfs's account.
However, as mentioned in #1906, we do need more variation of machines and sensors to extend coverage of our Kepler on Cloud use case.

This issue is to investigate how could we get more machine sponsors to the Kepler project in the right process under CNCF umbrella.

Action items

  • investigating what against the compliance and what is not
  • investigating who calls for sponsorships - via Kepler community or CNCF or LF?
  • listing in-demand machines/sensors (e.g., from [Track] Call for Machine/Device Sponsorship #1906 (comment))
  • listing requirements for machines (e.g., must be supported by gh self-hosted runners)
  • listing requirements for access (what sponsors have to provide e.g., access key to self-hosted runner)
  • listing recognition items we can return
@sunya-ch sunya-ch added discussion Need more discussion metal-ci This issue is related to kepler-metal-ci labels Jan 22, 2025
@sunya-ch sunya-ch self-assigned this Jan 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
discussion Need more discussion metal-ci This issue is related to kepler-metal-ci
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant