You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I searched issues and couldn’t find anything (or linked relevant results below)
Problem
The first line of footnote definitions has some confusing properties:
For example, Mercury[^mercury], Venus[^venus], and Earth[^Earth].
[^Mercury]: **Mercury** is the first planet from the Sun and the smallest
in the Solar System.
[^Venus]: > (block quote) **Venus** is the second planet from
the Sun.
[^Earth]: (does indented code work here?) **Earth** is the third planet
from the Sun and the only astronomical object known to harbor life.
For example, Mercury[^mercury], Venus[^venus], and Earth[^Earth].
[^Mercury]:
**Mercury** is the first planet from the Sun and the smallest
in the Solar System.
[^Venus]:
> (block quote) **Venus** is the second planet from> the Sun.[^Earth]:
(does indented code work here?) **Earth** is the third planetfrom the Sun and the only astronomical object known to harbor life.
Alternatives
.
Footnotes
Mercury is the first planet from the Sun and the smallest
in the Solar System. ↩
(block quote) Venus is the second planet from
the Sun.
Initial checklist
Problem
The first line of footnote definitions has some confusing properties:
Yields:
For example, Mercury1, Venus2, and Earth3.
Solution
Format first line empty:
Alternatives
.
Footnotes
Mercury is the first planet from the Sun and the smallest
in the Solar System. ↩
(does indented code work here?) Earth is the third planet
from the Sun and the only astronomical object known to harbor life. ↩
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: