Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Insane memory usage and stalled jobs on development with tsc --watch #2913

Open
1 task done
emintatli opened this issue Nov 18, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
1 task done

Comments

@emintatli
Copy link

Version

v5.26.2

Platform

NodeJS

What happened?

running with tsc --watch or nodemon casuses insane amount of ram usage and/or stalled jobs.
Details:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/79197308/insane-amount-of-ram-usage-with-bullmq-fetch?noredirect=1#comment139654212_79197308

How to reproduce.

https://github.com/emintatli/bullmq-issue

Described in the repo

Relevant log output

No response

Code of Conduct

  • I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct
@emintatli emintatli added the bug Something isn't working label Nov 18, 2024
@manast manast removed the bug Something isn't working label Nov 18, 2024
@manast
Copy link
Contributor

manast commented Nov 18, 2024

Since you mention that it works well without tsc --watch or nodemon, then the watch mechanism of these tools may be messing up the app. It is a bit difficult to understand from your description if the problem is in Redis memory consumption or in the application itself. In any case, I think this issue is a bit out of the scope of BullMQ as it seems to be something quite specific to these tools, I think you did right in asking in stack-overflow as there may be more expertise in this area there than here.

@manast manast changed the title [Bug]: Insane memory usage and stalled jobs on development Insane memory usage and stalled jobs on development with tsc --watch Nov 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants