Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 15, 2022. It is now read-only.

Good first issue? #14

Open
Eugleo opened this issue Jan 31, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Good first issue? #14

Eugleo opened this issue Jan 31, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@Eugleo
Copy link

Eugleo commented Jan 31, 2019

Hey, I'd love to help you in some way. I don't have a lot of experience with Racket, but I'm sure I'd be able to do something given enough time. Is there any first issue you would recommend tackling?

@dvc94ch
Copy link
Member

dvc94ch commented Jan 31, 2019

Hi @Eugleo,

I'm not currently working on the racket-language-server. When starting out contributing to a new project in general low hanging fruit is to read through and improve the documentation. It also helps to actually use the project and finding rough edges you can polish. You can also look at the issues and see what you find interesting to work on to get some ideas.

Cheers,
David

@dvc94ch
Copy link
Member

dvc94ch commented Apr 26, 2019

Just as a note for people considering to contribute. My opinion is that the current approach might not be optimal. Most language servers reimplement a parser with for example treesitter. The current implementation lacks the performance necessary + 99% of the time the code has syntax errors. The racket ide only performs analysis when there are no errors, it's not an ideal design. Rust/typescript have great ide support built into the compiler. For legacy languages I think starting over is the best approach. Maybe it's even possible to write a library that performs most of the heavy lifting in a language agnostic way (see xtext as a source of inspiration)...

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants