You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Not sure if this is possible/practical at scale but it would seem that if you know the differences between transcriptome versions (i.e. minimum sequence needed to test for say ENS92 vs ENS93) then one could set up a relatively quick method of matching arbitrary derived transcriptomes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks @ttriche and we’ll make sure to check out Arkas
mikelove
changed the title
investigate modular filtering as an edge case for CQF/mantis
Small differences in derived txomes relative to reference txome (possible?)
Oct 29, 2018
Not sure if this is possible/practical at scale but it would seem that if you know the differences between transcriptome versions (i.e. minimum sequence needed to test for say ENS92 vs ENS93) then one could set up a relatively quick method of matching arbitrary derived transcriptomes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: