You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I agree that [ foo ] ++ bar is better written as foo :: bar.
Still, I would say that foo ++ [bar] ++ baz is better than foo ++ bar :: baz.
It would be nice whether this rule did not produce a warning when the concatenation of a list literal with another value is preceded by another concatenation with a value
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I agree that
[ foo ] ++ bar
is better written asfoo :: bar
.Still, I would say that
foo ++ [bar] ++ baz
is better thanfoo ++ bar :: baz
.It would be nice whether this rule did not produce a warning when the concatenation of a list literal with another value is preceded by another concatenation with a value
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: